Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hatch v. Hatch, 547 P.2d 1044.

71 citing documents.

Engelby v. Engelby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“Property may not be distributed in order to reward one party or punish the other.”); Howie, 2025 WL 1711285, at *6, ¶ 30.
Howie v. Howie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Howie v. Howie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
divide the community, joint tenancy and other property held in common equitably, though not necessarily in kind, without regard to marital misconduct.”); (“Property may not be distributed in order to reward one party or punish the other.”).
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brucklier v. Brucklier 516 P.3d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
The court cannot impose a penalty or sanction in the form of a separate judgment beyond the property allocation because “[p]roperty may not be distributed in order to reward one party or punish the other.”
Brucklier v. Brucklier 516 P.3d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(Fault “should only be considered to the extent that there are excessive or abnormal expenditures, destruction, concealment or fraudulent disposition of community, joint tenancy and other property held in common.”); (Hays, J. dissenting) (The legislature’s enactment of A.R.S.
Dole v. Hon. blair/dole 463 P.3d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dole v. Hon. blair/dole 463 P.3d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Morrow v. Morrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Morrow v. Morrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Marriage of Inboden 225 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Marriage of Inboden 225 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Toth, 190 Ariz. at 221 , 946 P.2d at 903 ( , ).
In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 13 As recognized by our supreme court, the general principle is that “all marital joint property should be divided substantially equally unless sound reason exists to divide the property otherwise.” Toth, 190 Ariz. at 221 , 946 P.2d at 903 ( , ).
Marriage of Cook v. Cook 104 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Marriage of Cook v. Cook 104 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
A spouse’s interest in the marital community includes a “vested property interest.”
Kelly v. Kelly 9 P.3d 1046 Ariz. 2000
Kelly v. Kelly 9 P.3d 1046 Ariz. 2000
Toth v. Toth 946 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1997
Toth v. Toth 946 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1997
Martin v. Martin 893 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Martin v. Martin 893 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Guzman v. Guzman 854 P.2d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Guzman v. Guzman 854 P.2d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Matter of Estate of Patterson 805 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Shaw v. Quaintance 805 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Matter of Estate of Patterson 805 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Shaw v. Quaintance 805 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Egan-Ryan Mechanical Co. v. Cardon Meadows Development Corp. 818 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Egan-Ryan Mechanical Co. v. Cardon Meadows Development Corp. 818 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
487 , vacated on other grounds
Lynch v. Lynch 791 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Lynch v. Lynch 791 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Ray v. Mangum 788 P.2d 62 Ariz. 1989
Ray v. Mangum 788 P.2d 62 Ariz. 1989
Lincoln v. Lincoln 746 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lincoln v. Lincoln 746 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Garn v. Garn 745 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Garn v. Garn 745 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Whitmore v. Mitchell 733 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Whitmore v. Mitchell 733 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
While the record reflects no evidence of these special situations, and Arizona caselaw has interpreted § 25-318(A) as requiring a substantially equivalent distribution, , we note that a court may consider the expenditure of separate funds for the purpose of fulfilling existing joint obligations in accord with Valladee and Bowart .
Sample v. Sample 731 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Sample v. Sample 731 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Koelsch v. Koelsch 713 P.2d 1234 Ariz. 1986
Koelsch v. Koelsch 713 P.2d 1234 Ariz. 1986
Biddulph v. Biddulph 711 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Biddulph v. Biddulph 711 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
In Re Marriage of Berger 680 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In Re Marriage of Berger 680 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Westberry v. Reynolds 653 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by