Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'ASS'N v. Giglio, 549 P.2d 162.

19 citing documents.

Pacheco v. Coffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio
Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc. 118 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Gig lio, , 195, , 167 (1976); Brown v. Ariz. Dep’t of Real Estate
Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co. 64 P.3d 836 Ariz. 2003
The privileges and immunities granted extend only so far as they have a legitimate relationship to the legal objectives for which the District is organized.” Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio, (quoting City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agric.
State v. Tubbs 840 P.2d 303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Bayless Markets, Inc., , (citing Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio, , ).
Church v. Rawson Drug & Sundry Co. 842 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Salt River Valley Water Users’ , 195, , 167 (1976).
GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp. 795 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Salt River Valley Water Users’ , 195, , 167 (1976); Cote, 128 Ariz. at 444 , 626 P.2d at 608 .
Himes v. Particular Council of Pima County 728 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
There was no accountability by the conference to the council for its “day to day operation.” See Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’ , 196, , 168 (1976).
Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc. v. Construction, Production & Maintenance Laborers' Local 383 736 P.2d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Such damages are to be “based on gross, wanton, malicious and oppressive conduct or on conduct which shows spite, ill will or reckless indifference to the interest of others.” Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio, , 202, , 174 (1976).
Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance 723 P.2d 675 Ariz. 1986
Roper & Sons Motor Co., , (6) Intentional misconduct, Id.; Wetzel v. Gulf Oil Corp., 455 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1972); (7) Fraud, , 192 P. 249 (1920); (8) Oppression, Id.; Salt River Water Users’ , Jerman v. O’Leary, , *331 (9) Extreme, aggravated or outrageous conduct, , (10) Conduct involving an unreasonable risk of causing distress, Wetzel v. Gulf Oil Corp., supra.; (11) Reckless di
Jerman v. O'LEARY 701 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Salt River Valley Water Users’
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc. 695 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc. 695 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See Salt River Valley Water Users’ Assn, v. Giglio
Reed v. Hinderland 660 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1983
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’
Nienstedt v. Wetzel 651 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc. 647 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1982
See also Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc., , Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio
Cote v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 626 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio
Gulf Insurance v. Grisham 613 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1980
Keeping in mind that the party asserting the agency relationship has the burden of proving the agency, Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio, , we note that the Martinezes have not shown Sapp to fall within either of the above-mentioned types of agency.
Continental Life & Accident Co. v. Songer 603 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Giglio
Markiewicz v. SALT RIVER VALLEY, ETC. 576 P.2d 517 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by