Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Preimsberg v. Rosenblatt, 543 P.2d 773.

23 citing documents.

State v. Balderas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Balderas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/state 515 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2022
Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/state 515 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2022
(“The weight and sufficiency of the evidence for indictment is a decision which history and the Constitution leave to the judgment of the citizens chosen to serve as members of the grand jury.”); Marston’s, 114 Ariz. at 264 (“In order that it carry out its mission[,] the grand jury has a right to every man
State v. Hon blair/taveras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hon blair/taveras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
S allen/J Allen v. Hon. sanders/state of Arizona 382 P.3d 784 Ariz. 2016
S allen/J Allen v. Hon. sanders/state of Arizona 382 P.3d 784 Ariz. 2016
(“[It is a] long established rule that an indictment valid on its face is not subject to challenge on the ground that the grand jury acted on the basis of inadequate or incompetent evidence.”); see also State ex rel.
Sanchez v. Ainley 308 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Chronis v. Steinle 208 P.3d 210 Ariz. 2009
Chronis v. Steinle 208 P.3d 210 Ariz. 2009
Pitts v. Superior Court 862 P.2d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Korzep v. Superior Court 746 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Kamin 725 P.2d 1104 Ariz. 1986
State v. Kamin 725 P.2d 1104 Ariz. 1986
State v. Mussiah 685 P.2d 1364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Mussiah 685 P.2d 1364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
to support its position.
Baines v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTY 688 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Baines v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTY 688 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
State v. Guerrero 580 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Guerrero 580 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Jacobson, 22 Ariz.App.