Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dowthard, 373 P.2d 357.

83 citing documents.

State v. Chacon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Chacon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Montgomery 312 P.3d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Montgomery 312 P.3d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Sims v. Ryan 890 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Sims v. Ryan 890 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Tuzon 575 P.2d 1231 Ariz. 1978
State v. Tuzon 575 P.2d 1231 Ariz. 1978
State v. Marquez 558 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1976
State v. Marquez 558 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1976
State v. Falkner 542 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1975
State v. Falkner 542 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1975
P.2d 357 (1962), cert, denied, 372 U.S. 920 , 83 S.Ct 735 (1963).
State v. Riggins 528 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1974
State v. Riggins 528 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1974
State v. Puckett, supra; , .
City of Tucson v. Valencia 517 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
City of Tucson v. Valencia 517 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Shaw, 6 Ariz.App.
State v. Jackson 508 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Jackson 508 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Davidson 507 P.2d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Davidson 507 P.2d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
contains the following statement by our Arizona Supreme Court: “The judgment is complete and valid when it is orally pronounced by the court and entered in the minutes.
State v. Ballinger 504 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Ballinger 504 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Rendel 501 P.2d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Rendel 501 P.2d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Jackson 494 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Jackson 494 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Willmon v. State Ex Rel. Eyman 493 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Willmon v. State Ex Rel. Eyman 493 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Rule 325, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.; , cert.
State v. Johnson 493 P.2d 498 Ariz. 1972
State v. Johnson 493 P.2d 498 Ariz. 1972
Weiss v. Superior Court of Pima County 472 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Weiss v. Superior Court of Pima County 472 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Although we agree that a judgment of guilty is complete when orally pronounced, , State v. Smith, 6 Ariz.App.
State v. Berryman 475 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1970
State v. Berryman 475 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1970
A certified copy of the minute entry is the only instrument needed to justify the proper authorities of the state prison in receiving and holding a defendant until his sentence has expired or he is otherwise released according to law.” *293 , , we again said that “a judgment is complete and valid when it is orally pronounced by the court and entered in the minutes.” Rule 339, A.R.S.
State v. Davis 467 P.2d 743 Ariz. 1970
State v. Davis 467 P.2d 743 Ariz. 1970
State v. Quinn 460 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Quinn 460 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
at page 48, , at page 360 (1962).
State v. Chambers 451 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1969
State v. Chambers 451 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1969
affirmed 356 U.S. 390 , 78 S.Ct.
State v. Madrid 450 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Madrid 450 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
People v. Blackman, supra.
State v. Anderson 449 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Anderson 449 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
and State v. Chance, 4 Ariz.App.
Eyman v. Superior Court in and for County of Pinal 448 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Eyman v. Superior Court in and for County of Pinal 448 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Just as a writing is not essential to the validity of a judgment in a criminal case, , cert.
State v. Randall 443 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Randall 443 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Veres 436 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968