Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Perry v. Industrial Commission, 542 P.2d 1096.

215 citing documents.

Bank One Corp. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 244 P.3d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bank One Corp. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 244 P.3d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Comm’n, , (when medical testimony conflicts, it is the ALJ’s duty to resolve those conflicts).
Gutierrez v. Industrial Commission 243 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Gutierrez v. Industrial Commission 243 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial Commission 6 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial Commission 6 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See Perry v. Industrial Comm’n, , Vance Int’l v. Industrial Comm’n, ¶ 6 , (court defers to ALJ’s factual determination).
Bohn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 984 P.2d 565 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Bohn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 984 P.2d 565 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Perry v. Industrial Comm’n
Glodo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 955 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Glodo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 955 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See, e.g., Perry v. Industrial Comm’n
Tsosie v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 905 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Tsosie v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 905 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
The facts, taken in the light most favorable to affirming the award, , are as follows.
Wal-Mart v. Industrial Commission 901 P.2d 1175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Wal-Mart v. Industrial Commission 901 P.2d 1175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Hartford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 870 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hartford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 870 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Perry v. Industrial Comm’n, , , *110 1097 (1975).
Hopkins v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 859 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Hopkins v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 859 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
When expert medical testimony conflicts, it is the AU’s duty to resolve those conflicts, Perry v. Industrial Comm’n, , but uncontroverted medical findings are binding on the Industrial Commission.
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission 836 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
We find no support in the evidence for the ALJ’s conclusion that London was Reeder’s employer and, therefore, that London was a joint employer of Reeder with Brad’s. As a result, the award “cannot be reasonably supported on any reasonable theory of the evidence.”
Ball Mfg. v. Industrial Commission 827 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ball Mfg. v. Industrial Commission 827 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See, e.g., Perry v. Industrial Comm’n
Lopez v. Industrial Commission 785 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Lopez v. Industrial Commission 785 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Perry v. Industrial Comm’n
W.F. Dunn, Sr. & Son v. Industrial Commission 773 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
W.F. Dunn, Sr. & Son v. Industrial Commission 773 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Perry v. Industrial Comm’n
Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 770 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1989
Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 770 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1989
we stated that the judge must resolve all conflicts in the evidence, especially when the conflicts involve expert medical testimony.
Tyree v. Industrial Commission 764 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Tyree v. Industrial Commission 764 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Perry v. Industrial Comm’n
Scottsdale Memorial Hospital v. Industrial Commission 761 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Scottsdale Memorial Hospital v. Industrial Commission 761 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
The Industrial Commission has the duty to resolve all conflicts in the evidence, especially conflicts in the medical testimony, and this court does not “weigh the evidence but considers it in the light most favorable to sustaining the award____” Perry v. In *99 dustrial Comm’n
Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 747 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1987
Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 747 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1987
Villanueva v. Industrial Commission 714 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Villanueva v. Industrial Commission 714 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Pearce Development v. Industrial Commission 712 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Pearce Development v. Industrial Commission 712 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Pena v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 683 P.2d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Pena v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 683 P.2d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 275 Ariz. 1983
Bill Breck Dodge, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 275 Ariz. 1983
-99 , -98 (1975); -17 , -89 (1968).
Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 676 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1983
Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA 676 P.2d 1096 Ariz. 1983
Lazarin v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 661 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Lazarin v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 661 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
We are not the triers of fact and the Commission’s findings will not be disturbed unless its conclusion “cannot reasonably be supported on any reasonable theory of the evidence.” -99 , -98 (1975).