Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Van Buren v. Pima Community College District Board, 546 P.2d 821.

46 citing documents.

Hammer v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Hammer v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
staff regarding zoning matters.” Hammer opposed the motion on several 2 HAMMER v. PHOENIX Opinion of the Court grounds and contended the City owed a duty of care under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552 (1977)
Strojnik v. Flagexpress, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Strojnik v. Flagexpress, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Bd., (explaining negligent misrepresentation is governed by negligence 5 STROJNIK v. FLAGEXPRESS, LLC, et al. Decision of the Court principles and, thus, requires “a duty owed and a breach of that duty”); Bakersfield, 436 F. S
KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance 340 P.3d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance 340 P.3d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bd., (citation omitted).7 Here, as described above, neither Drachman Leed nor American E&S owed a duty to KB, a third-party non-client, and KB did not establish a misrepresentation.
Lemad v. Miravista Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lemad v. Miravista Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bd., (citing the Restatement (Second) P.2d 153 (1959), there must be “a duty owed and a breach of that duty before one may be charged with the negligent violation of that duty.”).
Sage v. BLAGG APPRAISAL CO., LTD. 209 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Sage v. BLAGG APPRAISAL CO., LTD. 209 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bd., , (applying section 552 to employer’s statement to prospective employee).
PLM Tax Certificate Program 1991-92, L.P. v. Schweikert 162 P.3d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
PLM Tax Certificate Program 1991-92, L.P. v. Schweikert 162 P.3d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund 38 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2002
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund 38 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2002
Moreover, the two cases Dunlap relied on for this proposition, , did not hold fraudulent concealment is subject to a disclosure duty.
Wells Fargo Bank v. Az Laborers Ariz. 2002
Wells Fargo Bank v. Az Laborers Ariz. 2002
Moreover, the two cases Dunlap relied on for this proposition, Schock v. Jacka and Van Buren v. Pima Community College District Board, 113 Ariz. 85, did not hold fraudulent concealment is subject to a disclosure duty.
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
v. Reserve Life Ins., , , Ariz. Title Ins.
Dunlap v. City of Phoenix 817 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Dunlap v. City of Phoenix 817 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Subsequently, the Arizona Supreme Court, , stated: “that damages would lie in a proper case of negligent *368 misrepresentation.
Aztlan Lodge No. 1 v. Ruffner 745 P.2d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Aztlan Lodge No. 1 v. Ruffner 745 P.2d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
The Masons’ claim was based upon the substantive theory of negligent misrepresentation based upon Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552 (1965)
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1987
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1987
Formento v. Encanto Business Park 744 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Formento v. Encanto Business Park 744 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
St. Joseph's Hospital v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
St. Joseph's Hospital v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. O’Malley Lumber Company, 14 Ariz.App.
Hill v. Jones 725 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Hill v. Jones 725 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Arizona courts have long recognized that under certain circumstances there may be a “duty to speak.”
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
and is governed by § 552 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
and is governed by § 552 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.
Frazier v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 653 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Frazier v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 653 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Arizona Title Insurance and Trust Company v. O’Malley Lumber Company, 14 Ariz.App.
Mammas v. Oro Valley Townhouses, Inc. 638 P.2d 1367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Mammas v. Oro Valley Townhouses, Inc. 638 P.2d 1367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
National Housing Industries, Inc. v. E. L. Jones Development Co. 576 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
National Housing Industries, Inc. v. E. L. Jones Development Co. 576 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Arizona Title Insurance and Trust Company v. O’Malley Lumber Company, 14 Ariz.App.
Roy H. Long Realty Company, Inc. v. Vanderkolk 547 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Roy H. Long Realty Company, Inc. v. Vanderkolk 547 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Van Buren v. Pima Community College District Board, Ariz.