Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arceneaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 550 P.2d 87.

42 citing documents.

Beaver v. American Family Mutual Insurance 324 P.3d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Beaver v. American Family Mutual Insurance 324 P.3d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 21 P.3d 395 Ariz. 2001
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 21 P.3d 395 Ariz. 2001
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 998 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Barerra 998 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Co., -18 , -89 (1976) (holding that a household exclusion in a primary automobile insurance policy was valid, so long as the minimum levels of Arizona’s Financial Responsibility Act were met).
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Young 985 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Young 985 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Co., , (“In matters not mandated by law (or the public policy of the state) the parties should be permitted to make their own contractual arrangements.”); Luehrs v. Utah Home Fire Ins.
Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-Pacheco 962 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-Pacheco 962 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Nine years later, however, our supreme court disapproved of that language, characterizing it as “pure dictum.”
Transportation Insuarnce v. Bruining 921 P.2d 24 Ariz. 1996
Transportation Insuarnce v. Bruining 921 P.2d 24 Ariz. 1996
Averett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 869 P.2d 505 Ariz. 1994
Averett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 869 P.2d 505 Ariz. 1994
Co., , responded with an offer of $15,000 per child, even though the policy declarations recited bodily injury limits of $250,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence, and the children’s injuries admittedly exceeded those amounts.
Pruett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 857 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Pruett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 857 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Co., , and its predecessors.
Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co. 828 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co. 828 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Powers 786 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Powers 786 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dimmer 773 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dimmer 773 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
the parties were free to include a household exclusion so long as it did not preclude recovery for the statutory minimum.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Janssen 742 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Janssen 742 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Co., , but rather declared the exclusion invalid in its entirety.
Spain v. Valley Forge Insurance 731 P.2d 84 Ariz. 1987
Spain v. Valley Forge Insurance 731 P.2d 84 Ariz. 1987
Spain v. Valley Forge Insurance 731 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Spain v. Valley Forge Insurance 731 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
is dispositive of this issue.
McClellan v. Sentry Indemnity Co. 683 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
McClellan v. Sentry Indemnity Co. 683 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Co., , to support its contention that its liability should be limited to the statutorily required coverage.
Cassel v. Schacht 683 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Cassel v. Schacht 683 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
See , (household exclusion); , (upheld exclusion of insured’s own personal injuries); Schwab v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 27 Ariz.App.
Hagen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 675 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Hagen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 675 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In making this argument, USF & G
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO., ETC. v. Rick 654 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO., ETC. v. Rick 654 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Warfe v. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. 589 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Warfe v. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. 589 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Co., , Caballero v. Farmers Ins.
Mission Insurance v. Aid Insurance Services 585 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1978
Mission Insurance v. Aid Insurance Services 585 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1978