Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. George, 390 P.2d 899.
- State v. Sims 409 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Douglas 407 P.2d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
-
State v. Douglas
407 P.2d 117
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
The Arizona Supreme Court stated: “However, instructions must be considered as a whole and no case will be reversed because of some isolated paragraph or portion of an instruction which, standing alone, might be misleading.” , .
- State v. Hardin 406 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Johnson 406 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Johnson
406 P.2d 403
Ariz. 1965
: “It is well settled that appellate courts will only consider such questions as were raised at the trial with respect to errors or omissions in the giving of instructions.
-
State v. Hardin
406 P.2d 406
Ariz. 1965
* * ” See also, -370 , -902 (1964).
- State v. Bearden 405 P.2d 885 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Bearden
405 P.2d 885
Ariz. 1965
In accordance with our rule to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state and resolve all reasonable inferences unfavorably to the defendant, , , we find the facts to be as follows: On September 20, 1963, Salone and McBroom, the latter being defendant’s cousin, entered the Mode O’Day Shop in Phoenix and asked Mrs. Snyder, the owner, if they could see some dresses.
- State v. Moraga 403 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Moraga 403 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Pearson 402 P.2d 557 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Pearson
402 P.2d 557
Ariz. 1965
In reviewing the evidence, this Court will view it in the light most favorable to the State and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant, , ; , .
- State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Corrales 391 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Maxwell 391 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Maxwell 391 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1964