Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Glendale v. Bradshaw, 560 P.2d 420.

42 citing documents.

Pruitt v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Pruitt v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Helmreich v. Ahc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Helmreich v. Ahc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Holdings, L.L.C., ¶ 88 (App. 2012), and afford the court “wide discretion” in granting a new trial, –38 (1977).
State v. Corwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Corwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Fischer, 242 Ariz. at 49, ¶ 14; (trial court “saw the witnesses, heard the testimony, knew the issues, and had a perspective on the relationship between evidence and verdict [the appellate court] can never achieve by a bare reading of the record”).
State of Arizona v. Robert Fischer 392 P.3d 488 Ariz. 2017
State of Arizona v. Robert Fischer 392 P.3d 488 Ariz. 2017
Hague v. Bill Houston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hague v. Bill Houston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See McBride v. Kieckhefer Assocs., Inc., ¶ 16, (-38, -22 (1977); Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agric.
Mill Alley Partners v. Wallace 341 P.3d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mill Alley Partners v. Wallace 341 P.3d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 273 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2012
Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 273 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2012
(determining whether verdict is against the weight of the evidence “is uniquely within the province of the trial judge”).
McBride v. KIECKHEFER ASSOCIATES, INC. 265 P.3d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
McBride v. KIECKHEFER ASSOCIATES, INC. 265 P.3d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-38 , -22 (1977) (discussing “the wide discretion afforded the trial court in granting a new trial”); Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agrie.
Gonzales v. City of Phoenix 52 P.3d 184 Ariz. 2002
Gonzales v. City of Phoenix 52 P.3d 184 Ariz. 2002
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 961 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1998
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 961 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1998
Anderson v. Preferred Stock Food Markets, Inc. 854 P.2d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Anderson v. Preferred Stock Food Markets, Inc. 854 P.2d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rosen v. Knaub 842 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rosen v. Knaub 842 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(“great” discretion given to trial court in determining whether evidence required an adjustment of the verdict).
Tamsen v. Weber 802 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Tamsen v. Weber 802 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Wendling v. Southwest Sav.
Sedillo v. City of Flagstaff 737 P.2d 1377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Sedillo v. City of Flagstaff 737 P.2d 1377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Begay v. City of Tucson 715 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1986
Begay v. City of Tucson 715 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1986
Carlton v. Emhardt 674 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Carlton v. Emhardt 674 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Melcher v. Melcher 669 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Melcher v. Melcher 669 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Reeves v. Markle 579 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1978
Reeves v. Markle 579 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1978
Reeves v. Markle 580 P.2d 2 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Reeves v. Markle 580 P.2d 2 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977