Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Boyle v. City of Phoenix, 563 P.2d 905.

41 citing documents.

Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc. 156 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc. 156 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dunham v. Pima County 754 P.2d 761 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Dunham v. Pima County 754 P.2d 761 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
The lack of liability may be framed in terms of duty, see, , but we prefer that duty be recognized as a distinct element involving the obligation of the actor to protect the other from harm.
Rudy v. Meshorer 706 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Rudy v. Meshorer 706 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Coburn v. City of Tucson 691 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1984
Coburn v. City of Tucson 691 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1984
The lack of liability may be framed in terms of duty, see, , but we prefer that duty be recognized as a distinct element involving the obligation of the actor to protect the other from harm.
Matts v. City of Phoenix 669 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Matts v. City of Phoenix 669 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 667 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 667 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Chewning v. Palmer 650 P.2d 438 Ariz. 1982
Chewning v. Palmer 650 P.2d 438 Ariz. 1982
Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America
Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc. 639 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1982
Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc. 639 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1982
103, 106-07 , -41 (1969)
Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Maricopa County, Inc. 637 P.2d 733 Ariz. 1981
Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Maricopa County, Inc. 637 P.2d 733 Ariz. 1981
Mobile Home Estates, Inc. v. Levitt Mobile Homes Systems, Inc.
Rogers v. Associates Commercial Corp. 632 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Rogers v. Associates Commercial Corp. 632 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Anderson v. Mobile Discount Corp., supra.
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Kiser v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc., 9 Ariz.App.
Hiser v. Randolph 617 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hiser v. Randolph 617 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Viewing the evidence as we must on a motion for summary judgment, , Mrs. Hiser was in obvious need of emergency treatment.
Chernov v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 601 P.2d 284 Ariz. 1979
Chernov v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 601 P.2d 284 Ariz. 1979
here was one letter, a “P” visible, and there were no — a faded remnant of patches, slight patches of paint, perhaps where the “ST” and “0” might have been, but the only discemable and definable letter in front of the crosswalk was the “P”; it was somewhat faded.” In viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment, , it is clear that St.
Sullins v. Third & Catalina Construction Partnership 602 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Sullins v. Third & Catalina Construction Partnership 602 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Wisener v. State 598 P.2d 511 Ariz. 1979
Wisener v. State 598 P.2d 511 Ariz. 1979
Keck v. Jackson 593 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1979
Keck v. Jackson 593 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1979
Anderson v. Mobile Discount Corp. 595 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Anderson v. Mobile Discount Corp. 595 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Vern Walton Motors v. Taylor 591 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Partin v. Olney 591 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Partin v. Olney 591 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Vern Walton Motors v. Taylor 591 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Lake Havasu Irrigation & Drainage District v. Dubois 573 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
McGeorge v. City of Phoenix 572 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
McGeorge v. City of Phoenix 572 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
where it found no duty owing to a bicyclist struck by t. car' when vege+o.tion obscured the view of an intersecting street.