Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Smith v. Industrial Commission, 552 P.2d 1198.

58 citing documents.

Cavco Industries v. Industrial Commission 631 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Cavco Industries v. Industrial Commission 631 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
The main thrust of petitioner’s argument is that under two recent decisions by the Arizona Supreme Court; , , the language of Rule 13(d) 1 of the Rules of Procedure for Workmen’s Compensation Hearings before the Industrial Commission of Arizona (A.C.R.R.R4-13-113(D)) has been so diluted that there no longer exists a definable standard by which the existence or nonexistence of permanent impairment can m
Arizona Sand & Rock v. IND. COM'N OF ARIZONA 600 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Arizona Sand & Rock v. IND. COM'N OF ARIZONA 600 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
which concern the application of the Workmen’s Compensation Act to a second injury after a prior non-industrial injury.
All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 565 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1977
All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 565 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1977