Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Sun City Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission, 556 P.2d 1126.
- Aps v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Aps v. Acc
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Co., 178 Ariz. at 437 ( vacated on other grounds by ).
- Sunburst v. Hon. gama/halt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Sunburst v. Hon. gama/halt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Arizona cases make clear that on remand, the lower court “has no choice but to enter a judgment which complies exactly with that which the higher court has ordered.” accord Sun City Water Co. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, (remand limits further action to “the terms of the mandate”); Tovrea v. Superior Court, 101 3 SUNBURST v. HON.
- Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. Commission 352 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. Commission
352 P.3d 925
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co., , (quoting Sun City Water Co. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, , ).
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc.
83 P.3d 573
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(concluding court lacked authority to affirm Commission decision in part and remand another portion); Arizona Corp. Comm'n v. Fred Harvey Transp.
- Litchfield Park Service Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 874 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Litchfield Park Service Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
874 P.2d 988
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
304, 309 , , vacated on other grounds
- Tonto Creek Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission 864 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Tonto Creek Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission
864 P.2d 1081
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Sun City Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n
- Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
818 P.2d 714
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, e.g., Purolator Sec., , Sun City Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n
- Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 645 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1982
-
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
645 P.2d 231
Ariz. 1982
Sun City Water, supra, at 465 , at 1127 .
- Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
- Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
- Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 645 P.2d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
-
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
645 P.2d 243
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
It is settled that the superior court may not reweigh the evidence and substitute its judgment where the Commission has not “abused its range of legislative discretion.” , see Arizona Corporation Commission v. Arizona Public Service.
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 604 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- MOUNTAIN STATES, ETC. v. Ariz. Corp. Com'n 604 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
MOUNTAIN STATES, ETC. v. Ariz. Corp. Com'n
604 P.2d 1144
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
that a reviewing court may not by way of remand to the Commission require the Commission to institute any particular further proceedings.
-
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
604 P.2d 1144
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
that a reviewing court may not by way of remand to the Commission require the Corn-mission to institute any particular further proceedings.
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Citizens Utilities Co. 584 P.2d 1175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
-
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Citizens Utilities Co.
584 P.2d 1175
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
304 , vacated in , to discuss at length the scope of judicial review of rate decisions by the Arizona Corporation Commission.