Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles, 564 P.2d 1227.

113 citing documents.

DeHoney v. Hernandez 595 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1979
DeHoney v. Hernandez 595 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1979
Plaintiffs, however, point to Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles, , in support of their position that the public duty was nar *373 rowed to a special duty.
Bagley v. State 595 P.2d 157 Ariz. 1979
Bagley v. State 595 P.2d 157 Ariz. 1979
Besserman v. Town of Par
Papenhausen v. Schoen 268 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1978
Olson v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 580 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Olson v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 580 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
McGeorge v. City of Phoenix 572 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Wesley v. State 571 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
McGeorge v. City of Phoenix 572 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Finally, , while at the same time it altered the absolute immunity rule as to public officials acting in their discretionary functions.
Wesley v. State 571 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
which we will later discuss and distinguish.
Besserman v. Town of Paradise Valley, Inc. 569 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Besserman v. Town of Paradise Valley, Inc. 569 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
filed April 11, 1977, our Supreme Court held that members of the Board of Pardons and Paroles narrowed its duty owed to the public generally to one owed to individuals when they released on parole a prisoner with a history of violent and dangerous conduct toward other persons.