Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Standage Ventures, Inc. v. State, 562 P.2d 360.
- Bohonus v. Amerco 602 P.2d 469 Ariz. 1979
-
Bohonus v. Amerco
602 P.2d 469
Ariz. 1979
“Generally, the doctrine states that a party who has assumed a particular position in one judicial proceeding will not be allowed to assume an inconsistent position in a subsequent proceeding.” Standage Ventures
- Continental Life & Accident Co. v. Songer 603 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Continental Life & Accident Co. v. Songer 603 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.
603 P.2d 513
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Further, where “an ambiguity exists on the face of the document or the language admits of differing interpretations, parol evidence is admissible to clarify and explain the document.” Standage Ventures
- Colonia Verde Homeowners Ass'n v. Kaufman 596 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
-
Colonia Verde Homeowners Ass'n v. Kaufman
596 P.2d 712
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
402 , , Standage Ventures
- Hellyer v. Hellyer 580 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- Hellyer v. Hellyer 580 P.2d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978