Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nataros v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, 557 P.2d 1055.

58 citing documents.

Salinas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Salinas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
("A special action requests extraordinary relief which is usually granted only where justice cannot be satisfactorily obtained by other means.").
E.L. v. Hon Carman 500 P.3d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
E.L. v. Hon Carman 500 P.3d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hwal'bay Ba J Enterprises Inc v. Hon. jantzen/fox Ariz. 2020
Hwal'bay Ba J Enterprises Inc v. Hon. jantzen/fox Ariz. 2020
¶ 53 (2018); -500 (1976).
AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc. 346 P.3d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc. 346 P.3d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
of Maricopa, -53, ¶ 2 , -96 (App.2000)), or “when the party has no plain, adequate or speedy remedy by appeal, and justice cannot be obtained by other means.” Luis A., 197 Ariz. at 453, ¶ 2 , 4 P.3d at 996 ( , ).
Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Frimmel v. Hon. sanders/state 338 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Frimmel v. Hon. sanders/state 338 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Medrano v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Medrano v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
If such an action is filed prior to favorable termination of the proceedings, the action is premature and subject to dismissal.” (citing cases).
Catalina Foothills Unif. Sch. Distr. No. 16 v. La Paloma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Catalina Foothills Unif. Sch. Distr. No. 16 v. La Paloma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
See Nataros v. Superior Court, 113 Ariz. 498, 499, (“A special action requests extraordinary relief which is usually granted only where justice cannot be satisfactorily obtained by other means.”).
STATE EX REL. MONTGOMERY v. Whitten 262 P.3d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
STATE EX REL. MONTGOMERY v. Whitten 262 P.3d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Haag v. Steinle 255 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Haag v. Steinle 255 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Re the Commitment of Robert Flemming 131 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
In Re the Commitment of Robert Flemming 131 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State ex rel. Wangberg v. Smith 118 P.3d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State ex rel. Wangberg v. Smith 118 P.3d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Ct. of Maricopa County, , ), or where the issue is one of statewide importance.
Newkirk v. Nothwehr 115 P.3d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Newkirk v. Nothwehr 115 P.3d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
( , ), or where the issue is one of statewide importance, Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n v. Myers
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Conn 98 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Conn 98 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
( , ), or where the issue is one of statewide importance, Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n v. Myers
Qwest Corporation v. Mark McMahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Qwest Corporation v. Mark McMahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
LUIS A. v. Bayham-Lesselyong 4 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
LUIS A. v. Bayham-Lesselyong 4 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Hutt 987 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Hutt 987 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State Compensation Fund v. Symington 848 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1993
State Compensation Fund v. Symington 848 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1993
Davis v. Winkler 793 P.2d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Davis v. Winkler 793 P.2d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Because the issue raised here is not susceptible to review on appeal, , and because of the statewide importance of the application of A.R.S.
Frey v. Stoneman 722 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1986
Frey v. Stoneman 722 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1986
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 674 (1965).
Frey v. Stoneman 722 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Frey v. Stoneman 722 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Moran v. Klatzke 682 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Moran v. Klatzke 682 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Owen v. Shores, 24 Ariz.App.
King v. Superior Court 673 P.2d 787 Ariz. 1983
King v. Superior Court 673 P.2d 787 Ariz. 1983
We generally accept jurisdiction of these cases only where the issues raised in the petition are such that justice cannot be satisfactorily obtained by other means
University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court 667 P.2d 1294 Ariz. 1983
University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court 667 P.2d 1294 Ariz. 1983
Armstrong v. Hooker 661 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Armstrong v. Hooker 661 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982