Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marston's, Inc. v. Strand, 560 P.2d 778.

28 citing documents.

Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/state 515 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2022
Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/state 515 P.3d 142 Ariz. 2022
to bring to trial those who may be guilty and clear the innocent,” in Arizona, the grand jury’s power “is not unlimited, and that power is subject to judicial control.” Marston’s, –65 (1977).
Juan Carlos Vicente Sanchez v. Hon. ainley/state of Arizona 321 P.3d 415 Ariz. 2014
Juan Carlos Vicente Sanchez v. Hon. ainley/state of Arizona 321 P.3d 415 Ariz. 2014
¶ 8 A grand jury is an investigative body “whose mission is to bring to trial those who may be guilty and [to] clear the innocent.” Marston’s
Maretick v. Jarrett 62 P.3d 120 Ariz. 2003
Maretick v. Jarrett 62 P.3d 120 Ariz. 2003
The grand jury’s mission is “to bring to trial those who may be guilty and clear the innocent.” Marston’s
Samaritan Health System v. Superior Court 895 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Samaritan Health System v. Superior Court 895 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
See Marston’s, 265 , 783 (1977).
Pitts v. Superior Court 862 P.2d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Pitts v. Superior Court 862 P.2d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
See Marston’s, , State v. Good, 10 Ariz.App.
Franzi v. Superior Court of Arizona 679 P.2d 1043 Ariz. 1984
Franzi v. Superior Court of Arizona 679 P.2d 1043 Ariz. 1984
we discussed the function and powers of the grand jury.
Pool v. Superior Court 677 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1984
Pool v. Superior Court 677 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1984
Turley v. State , , 70-71 , , 316-17 (1936); Marston's, Inc. v. Strand , , 268 , , 786 (1977) (Gordon, J. specially concurring in part and dissenting in part).
Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY. 668 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1983
Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY. 668 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1983
Gershon v. Broomfield 642 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1982
Gershon v. Broomfield 642 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1982
The Attorney General argues that Mar-ston’s, , stands for the proposition that the Attorney General does not need the state grand jury’s consent before subpoenaing grand jury witnesses.
State v. Rivera 624 P.2d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Rivera 624 P.2d 324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 609 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 609 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
613 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974); Marston’s
State v. Superior Court 580 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Superior Court 580 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978