Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior Court, 557 P.2d 526.

66 citing documents.

Swengel-Robbins, Inc. v. Gayle Contracting, Inc. 654 P.2d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Swengel-Robbins, Inc. v. Gayle Contracting, Inc. 654 P.2d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
As support for this position, Gayle relies almost entirely on the supreme court’s
Chase v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 641 P.2d 1305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Chase v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 641 P.2d 1305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Senor T's Restaurant v. Industrial Commission 641 P.2d 848 Ariz. 1982
Senor T's Restaurant v. Industrial Commission 641 P.2d 848 Ariz. 1982
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
McIntyre v. Mohave County 620 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1980
McIntyre v. Mohave County 620 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1980
In interpreting statutes, this court will “ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature.”
D. C. Speer Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of Transportation 603 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
D. C. Speer Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of Transportation 603 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
This task is made simple by our Supreme Court’s , where the court said: [I]t is clear that the preference given by the statute (A.R.S.
McEldowney v. Osborn School District No. 8 600 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1979
McEldowney v. Osborn School District No. 8 600 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1979
Appellant has not cited, nor have we been able to discover, any evidence of an intent of the Arizona Legislature, the paramount consideration here [ , Dewitt v. Magma Copper Co., supra], to protect teachers who obtain leaves of absence, whether for teaching abroad, family problems, or other reasons acceptable to their districts, from the ups or downs of the economy.
Department of Revenue v. Southern Union Gas Co. 582 P.2d 158 Ariz. 1978
Department of Revenue v. Southern Union Gas Co. 582 P.2d 158 Ariz. 1978