Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Certified Collectors, Inc. v. Lesnick, 570 P.2d 769.

26 citing documents.

Pointe 16 v. Gtis-Hov Ariz. 2025
Pointe 16 v. Gtis-Hov Ariz. 2025
¶22 In Certified Collectors, this Court explained: It is .
Synergy v. Singh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Synergy v. Singh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶17 Appellants rely on Certified Collectors
Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. 108 P.3d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. 108 P.3d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Sherman v. First American Title Insurance 38 P.3d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Sherman v. First American Title Insurance 38 P.3d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
As Sherman herself points out, cfiioting from Certified Collectors, , : “It is ...
Skarecky & Horenstein, P.A. v. 3605 North 36th Street Co. 825 P.2d 949 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Skarecky & Horenstein, P.A. v. 3605 North 36th Street Co. 825 P.2d 949 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Certified Collectors, , General Accident Fire &amp
Morgan v. City of Phoenix 785 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Morgan v. City of Phoenix 785 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp. 779 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp. 779 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. Daniels 715 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1986
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. Daniels 715 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1986
State v. Waicelunas 672 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Waicelunas 672 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Certified Collectors, , Matter of Torstenson’s Estate
Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc. 650 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1982
Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc. 650 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1982
Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc. 638 P.2d 210 Ariz. 1981
Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc. 638 P.2d 210 Ariz. 1981
Therefore, we will affirm the trial court’s result in granting revocation against Jimmy GMC, see Certified Collectors, , and vacate the portion of the Court of Appeals’ opinion reversing that result.
Norton v. First Federal Savings 624 P.2d 854 Ariz. 1981
Norton v. First Federal Savings 624 P.2d 854 Ariz. 1981
We have said that an assignment of a contract is subject to the same requisites for validity as are other contracts, Certified Collectors
Cruz v. Lusk Collection Agency 580 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Cruz v. Lusk Collection Agency 580 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
In Certified Collectors, , the court recognized, as being the general rule, the well-settled proposition that a valid assignee of a chose in action may bring a suit thereon in his own name.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by