Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite K. W. Dart Truck Co. v. Noble, 567 P.2d 325.

38 citing documents.

Webb v. Gittlen 174 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2008
Webb v. Gittlen 174 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2008
(holding that the legislature could statutorily assign an injured worker’s claim to his employer’s insurer in certain circumstances).
Dugan v. Fujitsu Business Communications Systems, Inc. 937 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Dugan v. Fujitsu Business Communications Systems, Inc. 937 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
that “[gjenerally an unliquidated claim for damages arising out of a tort is not assignable.” PW also relies on Sabon Investments, Inc. v. Braniff Airways, Inc., 534 F.Supp.
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 780 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 780 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Easter v. Percy 756 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Easter v. Percy 756 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Smith v. Payne 753 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1988
Smith v. Payne 753 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1988
State v. Superior Court 745 P.2d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Superior Court 745 P.2d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
the Arizona Supreme Court reiterated its position under the previous statute that once the claim had been assigned to the carrier, by operation of law, no claim remained in the injured worker upon which the worker could base an action against the negligent tortfeasor.
Lavello v. Wilson 722 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Lavello v. Wilson 722 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Hills v. Salt River Project Ass'n 698 P.2d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Hills v. Salt River Project Ass'n 698 P.2d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Talley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 670 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Talley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 670 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Travelers Insurance v. Breese 675 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Travelers Insurance v. Breese 675 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Karp v. Speizer 647 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Karp v. Speizer 647 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court 641 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1982
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court 641 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1982
State Farm Fire & , , Martinez v. Bucyrus-Erie Co., supra, and as noted above, the reliability was further eroded by our discussion of the reassignability issue in Stevens v. Textron, Inc., supra: “ * * * That case was decided prior to this Court’s determination of K. W. Dart Truck Company v. Noble, supra, and Martin
Ross v. Superior Court 625 P.2d 890 Ariz. 1981
Ross v. Superior Court 625 P.2d 890 Ariz. 1981
: “Generally an unliquidated claim for damages arising out of a tort is not assignable, State Farm Fire and Cas.
Stephens v. Textron, Inc. 619 P.2d 736 Ariz. 1980
Stephens v. Textron, Inc. 619 P.2d 736 Ariz. 1980
Meyer v. Kelsey-Hayes Corp. 613 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Meyer v. Kelsey-Hayes Corp. 613 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Hertel v. Home Insurance 604 P.2d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Hertel v. Home Insurance 604 P.2d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
the court held that the whole claim is assigned to the carrier and there is no equitable or beneficial interest which remains in the employee.
Canez v. Polanco 584 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Canez v. Polanco 584 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Trujillo v. Brasfield 579 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Trujillo v. Brasfield 579 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
is dispositive of this issue.