Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Vineyard, 392 P.2d 30.

46 citing documents.

State v. Jensen 970 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Jensen 970 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Serna 857 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Serna 857 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(rape); , (practicing law without a license); La Porte, 14 Ariz. at 534 , 132 P. at 564 (murder); , (burglary)
State v. Sweet 693 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1985
State v. Sweet 693 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1985
State v. Sanders 604 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Sanders 604 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Risher 574 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1978
State v. Risher 574 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1978
State v. Carrico 570 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1977
State v. Carrico 570 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1977
§ 13-611 , holding that § 13-611 defining rape did not create separate crimes, but ‘merely set this particular form of rape [Subsection B, second degree] apart from the other five [Subsection A, first degree] for the obvious purpose of allowing a different penalty to be assessed for its violation.’
State v. Risher 574 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Risher 574 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Starks 512 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Starks 512 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Nicholson 503 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1972
State v. Nicholson 503 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1972
State v. Klem 498 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1972
State v. Klem 498 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1972
§ 13-611 , holding that § 13-611 defining rape did not create separate crimes, but “merely set this particular form of rape [Subsection B, second degree] apart from the other five [Subsection A, first degree] for the obvious purpose of allowing a different penalty to be assessed for its violation.”
State v. Brown 489 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1971
State v. Brown 489 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1971
State v. Carpenter, supra; State v. Davis, supra
State v. Peoples 461 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1969
State v. Peoples 461 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1969
State v. Brady 461 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1969
State v. Brady 461 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1969
State v. Leon 451 P.2d 878 Ariz. 1969
State v. Leon 451 P.2d 878 Ariz. 1969
State v. Howland 439 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1968
State v. Howland 439 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1968
State v. Amey 436 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Amey 436 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Fierro 416 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1966
State v. Fierro 416 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1966
State v. Rusher 416 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1966
State v. Rusher 416 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1966
State v. Owen 410 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Owen 410 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Eyman v. McPherson, 1 Ariz.App.
State v. Bradley 409 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1965
State v. Bradley 409 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1965
State v. Logan 403 P.2d 279 Ariz. 1965
State v. Logan 403 P.2d 279 Ariz. 1965
State v. Faught 398 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1965
State v. Faught 398 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1965
We rejected appellant’s P.2d 30, 32 , decided since this appeal was taken.