Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Eastin v. Broomfield, 570 P.2d 744.

170 citing documents.

Barclay v. Jones 619 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Barclay v. Jones 619 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
( , and was then pending before the Supreme Court.)
State v. Watkins 614 P.2d 835 Ariz. 1980
State v. Watkins 614 P.2d 835 Ariz. 1980
2457 , 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975)
Litchfield Elementary School District No. 79 v. Babbitt 608 P.2d 792 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Litchfield Elementary School District No. 79 v. Babbitt 608 P.2d 792 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
New v. Arizona Board of Regents 618 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
New v. Arizona Board of Regents 618 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
our Supreme Court struck down as violative of Art. 2, § 13, Ariz.Const.
Barnet v. Superior Court 605 P.2d 445 Ariz. 1979
Barnet v. Superior Court 605 P.2d 445 Ariz. 1979
where we upheld that act’s constitutionality.
Campbell v. Arnold 590 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1979
Campbell v. Arnold 590 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1979
To allow parties in a medical malpractice action to seek appellate review of every decision of the panel prior to trial in the Superior Court would defeat the purpose of the Medical Malpractice Act which is to provide a system whereby meritorious claims can be quickly “separated from * * frivolous ones prior to trial and pretrial settlements [can be] encouraged.”
State v. Watson 586 P.2d 1253 Ariz. 1978
State v. Watson 586 P.2d 1253 Ariz. 1978
Iman v. Southern Pacific Co., 7 Ariz.App.
Campbell v. Arnold 590 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Campbell v. Arnold 590 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
the court in its discussion of the constitutionality of the Medical Malpractice Act, A.R.S.
Allen v. Fisher 574 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Allen v. Fisher 574 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
In Eastin v. Broomfield (Maricopa County Superior Court), , the Supreme Court recognized that A.R.S.