Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Van Loan v. Van Loan, 569 P.2d 214.

205 citing documents.

Lunney v. State 418 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lunney v. State 418 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“The failure to raise an issue .
Sandra Howell v. John Howell 361 P.3d 936 Ariz. 2015
Sandra Howell v. John Howell 361 P.3d 936 Ariz. 2015
Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“The failure to raise an issue .
Anne-Marie O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Anne-Marie O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“[F]ailure to raise an issue .
Thieme v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Thieme v. Adot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(arguments raised for first time on appeal are untimely and, therefore, deemed waived).
Armed Forces v. Namvar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Armed Forces v. Namvar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mrs. Namvar’s failure to challenge this issue on appeal “constitutes a waiver of the issue,”
Helland v. Helland 337 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Helland v. Helland 337 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
3 P.2d 214 (1977), holding that the marital community acquires a property right in unvested pension benefits upon performance by the employee spouse, does not change this analysis.
Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
(“[F]ailure to raise an issue either at the trial level or in briefs on appeal constitutes a waiver of the issue.”).
In THE ESTATE OF MARY A. RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES REILLY 266 P.3d 1078 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In THE ESTATE OF MARY A. RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES REILLY 266 P.3d 1078 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
(failure to raise issue in appellate briefs constitutes waiver); Fid.
Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Maria Henning v. Montecini Hospitality Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Maria Henning v. Montecini Hospitality Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Marriage of Boncoskey v. Boncoskey 167 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Boncoskey v. Boncoskey 167 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In its ruling appointing the Special Master, the trial court mentioned two prior Arizona Supreme Court cases, , and Johnson, 3 but stated *450 , controlled the valuation and payment parameters for this case.
Burkhamer v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Burkhamer v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(arguments raised for first time on appeal are waived); see also Health for Life Brands, (challenges to procedures waived if not raised in trial court).
In the Matter of Carly Van Dox Ariz. 2007
In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van Dox 152 P.3d 1183 Ariz. 2007
In the Matter of Carly Van Dox Ariz. 2007
(declining to address issues raised for first time on appeal).
In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van Dox 152 P.3d 1183 Ariz. 2007
(de-dining to address issues raised for first time on appeal).
Foster v. Weir Orthodontic Centers of Arizona, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Foster v. Weir Orthodontic Centers of Arizona, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane 118 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane 118 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
(holding that to the extent a spouse acquires unvested pension benefits from community efforts, that property right is divisible upon dissolution).
Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler 118 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Marriage of Kohler v. Kohler 118 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
State v. Glassel 116 P.3d 1193 Ariz. 2005
¶ 24, (rejecting argument made at oral argument in part because it was not presented either in the trial court or in the appellate briefs) ( ).
Pinal County v. Pinal County Employee Merit System Commission, Serb 116 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Pinal County v. Pinal County Employee Merit System Commission, Serb 116 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
(issues and arguments raised for first time at oral argument on appeal are untimely and generally deemed waived).
State of Arizona v. Derek Scott Oaks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Derek Scott Oaks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Orfaly, George, Albrecht, Reid v. Tucson Symphony Society... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Orfaly, George, Albrecht, Reid v. Tucson Symphony Society... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(arguments raised for first time on appeal are untimely and, therefore, deemed waived).3 3 Even had appellants not waived this claim, it is dubious.
North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana 93 P.3d 501 Ariz. 2004
North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana 93 P.3d 501 Ariz. 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc.