Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wasko v. Frankel, 569 P.2d 230.

33 citing documents.

State v. Hickman 68 P.3d 418 Ariz. 2003
State v. Hickman 68 P.3d 418 Ariz. 2003
B. ¶ 24 The rule established by Encinas, Kinsey
Young v. Johnson 31 P.3d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Young v. Johnson 31 P.3d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
(“Peremptory challenges form an effective method of assuring the fairness of a jury trial.”); , (unlawfully constituted jury deprives parties of right to “fair and impartial jury”).
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Dickens 926 P.2d 468 Ariz. 1996
State v. Huerta 855 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1993
State v. Huerta 855 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1993
Lopez v. Farmers Insurance 868 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Lopez v. Farmers Insurance 868 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
Distinguished State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
for his claim that the trial judge erred in failing to strike Brown.
State v. Huerta 826 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Huerta 826 P.2d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
The Sexton decision, , held that forcing a party to use peremptory challenges to strike jurors who should have been stricken for cause denies a litigant a substantial right and is not harmless error.
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
Lindley v. Northwest Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. 791 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Lindley v. Northwest Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. 791 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Sexton 787 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Sexton 787 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Rigsby 772 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1989
State v. Rigsby 772 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1989
-40 (1949); , (civil case disavowing trial court procedures that forced party to use peremptory challenge to strike jurors that the court should have stricken for cause).
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965); , State v. Thompson, supra ; Penaskovic v. F.W.
Kirby v. Rosell 648 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Kirby v. Rosell 648 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Rodriguez 641 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Rodriguez 641 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Moorer v. Clayton Manufacturing Corp. 627 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Moorer v. Clayton Manufacturing Corp. 627 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
131 P. 668 (1913); Johnson v. Harris, 23 Ariz.App.
Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Haney, 27 Ariz.App.