Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc., 570 P.2d 190.

42 citing documents.

U. S. Bank v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
U. S. Bank v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Props., Inc., (we must give effect to the unambiguous language of a contract).
Duffy v. Pearson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Duffy v. Pearson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Props., Inc., (citation omitted).
Sadeghi v. Majaly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sadeghi v. Majaly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Props., Inc., (citation omitted).
Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tavilla v. Blue Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tavilla v. Blue Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mining Investment Group, LLC v. Roberts 177 P.3d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Mining Investment Group, LLC v. Roberts 177 P.3d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Properties, Inc., , Grubb & Ellis Mgmt.
Powell v. Washburn 125 P.3d 373 Ariz. 2006
Powell v. Washburn 125 P.3d 373 Ariz. 2006
Props., Inc., Biltmore Estates, 177 Ariz. at 448, 868 P.2d at 1031.
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
See, e.g., Hadley v. Southwest Props., Inc., , Bar J , (citing Restatement § 766B, cmt.
Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc. 83 P.3d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc. 83 P.3d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See Hadley v. Southwest Prop., Inc., , (“The interpretation of the contract is a question of law for the court.”); accord Johnson v. NEW, Inc., 89 Wash.App.
Terry v. Gaslight Square Associates 897 P.2d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Terry v. Gaslight Square Associates 897 P.2d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.
State v. Mecham 844 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Mecham 844 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc., , Aritex Land Co. v. Baker, 14 Ariz.App.
Dixon v. City of Phoenix 845 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Dixon v. City of Phoenix 845 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. J.B. Contractors, Inc. 703 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. J.B. Contractors, Inc. 703 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.
Technical Equities Corp. v. Coachman Real Estate Investment Corp. 701 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Technical Equities Corp. v. Coachman Real Estate Investment Corp. 701 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co. 694 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co. 694 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc., , Divizio v. Kewin Enterprises, Inc.
Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. Grimm 682 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. Grimm 682 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc., , Hofmann Co. v. Meisner, 17 Ariz.App.
Goodman v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ. 670 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Goodman v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ. 670 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.
Maganas v. Northroup 663 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1983
Maganas v. Northroup 663 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1983
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.
Phillips v. Flowing Wells Unified School District No. 8 669 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Phillips v. Flowing Wells Unified School District No. 8 669 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.
Corral v. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance 630 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Corral v. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance 630 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.
Century Medical Plaza v. Goldstein 596 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Century Medical Plaza v. Goldstein 596 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Because interpretation of an unambiguous contract is a question of law for the court, Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc., , and the trial court correctly interpreted clause (a), it properly granted summary judgment for tenants as to that clause.