Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial Commission, 579 P.2d 555.

30 citing documents.

Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
Comm’n, this Court held that a claim for a mental breakdown that resulted from steadily increased work responsibility was compensable.
John R France v. ica/gila county/acip Ariz. 2021
John R France v. ica/gila county/acip Ariz. 2021
Comm’n of Ariz., –55 (1978) (holding that an employee sustained a compensable mental injury caused by the gradual build-up of stress due to a dramatically increased workload and responsibilities).
Martinez v. Shc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Martinez v. Shc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, -54, -58 (1978) (injury is caused by accident when resulting injury is unexpected; physical impact or exertion not required); see also State Comp.
Rowland v. Great States Insurance 20 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Doe 797 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Doe 797 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 774 P.2d 221 Ariz. 1989
Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 774 P.2d 221 Ariz. 1989
Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , (quoting Paulley v. Industrial Comm’n, , ).
Barnes v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Barnes v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Likewise, in Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Industrial Comm’n., , the employee “was a conscientious employee and a perfectionist” and this caused her to experience objectively ordinary events as traumatic.
Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 742 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 742 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Co. v. Industrial Comm’n
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
Our decisions in Fireman’s Fund & , , both involving job-related stress, required that an emotional condition must have been produced by some unexpected, unusual or extraordinary stress to qualify as an injury by accident.
Bush v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 667 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Bush v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 667 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Archer v. Industrial Commission 619 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Archer v. Industrial Commission 619 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Illustrative of this type of case is Fireman’s , which held that a mental breakdown resulting from the delegation to the claimant of excessive responsibilities was compensable.
Hooper v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 617 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hooper v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 617 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
See: , (“psychological disablement,” “disabling mental disorder”); Fireman’s , (“disabling nervous condition”); Bilbrey v. Industrial Commission, supra (“mental disability”).
Motorola, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 608 P.2d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Motorola, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 608 P.2d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
As the Arizona Supreme Court stated in Sloss v. Industrial Commission, supra : “Fireman’s Fund [Fireman’s , ] does not mean that every emotional condition even though work-related, is compensable.
Asarco, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 594 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Asarco, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 594 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
In her brief respondent cites the case of Fireman’s , for the proposition that a condition brought about by gradual work-related emotional stress can be compensable under Arizona’s Workmen’s Compensation Law.
Sloss v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 303 Ariz. 1978
Sloss v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 303 Ariz. 1978
Our recent decision in Fireman’s , addressed the issue.