Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lopez, 393 P.2d 263.

55 citing documents.

State v. Adams 419 P.2d 739 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Our Supreme Court has recently stated that relief from the operation of a judgment may be made within a reasonable time and that: “The trial court in the absence of a specific rule or statute has inherent jurisdiction to modify and vacate its own judgments and orders in criminal cases.”
State v. Cofhlin 412 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Cofhlin 412 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
our Supreme Court was confronted with the question of whether or not ah arrest was made and stated that “[t]he facts indicate that there was an.
Campbell v. Thurman 393 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1964
Campbell v. Thurman 393 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1964
we reaffirmed the rule of Sam, and held that the defendant may move for a reconsideration of the denial of a motion for a new trial in a criminal case under Rule 60(c).