Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Allstate Insurance v. Druke, 576 P.2d 489.

38 citing documents.

Cvs Pharmacy v. Hon. bostwick/tucson Medical Ariz. 2021
Cvs Pharmacy v. Hon. bostwick/tucson Medical Ariz. 2021
–04 (1978); State Farm Fire & Cas.
Estate v. Recoveryet Al. 326 P.3d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Estate v. Recoveryet Al. 326 P.3d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kobold v. Aetna Life Insurance 309 P.3d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Kobold v. Aetna Life Insurance 309 P.3d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(explaining that anti-subrogation rule protects insureds whose medical coverage may not indemnify them for all aspects of their loss, and does not affect rate schedules because insurers still receive the full benefit of the premiums paid).
Sw Fiduciary v. Health Care Cost Admin. 249 P.3d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Sw Fiduciary v. Health Care Cost Admin. 249 P.3d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(private insurer may not recover from insured's tort recovery for medical expenses incurred on behalf of insured), with A.R.S.
Monterey Homes Arizona, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance 212 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Monterey Homes Arizona, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance 212 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In making its "vested” argument
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care System 84 P.3d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care System 84 P.3d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(Arizona follows the common law rule that, absent a statute, an assignment of a cause of action for personal injuries against a third-party tort-feasor is void and unenforceable).
Botma v. Huser 39 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Botma v. Huser 39 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
a class action, the court considered an insurance policy provision that required insureds to “repay Allstate out of the proceeds” received from the tortfeasor.
Lingel v. Olbin 8 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Lingel v. Olbin 8 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Safeway Insurance v. Collins 963 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Safeway Insurance v. Collins 963 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
because it was impossible in Arizona to assign a personal injury claim via subrogation prior to enactment of section 20-259.01(1), -04 , -92 (1978), the statute itself creates the claim.
Lo Piano v. Hunter 840 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lo Piano v. Hunter 840 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Harleysville Mutual Ins.
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Vargas 754 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Vargas 754 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Janssen 742 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Janssen 742 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
American & Foreign Ins.
American and Foreign Ins. v. Allstate Ins. 677 P.2d 1331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
American and Foreign Ins. v. Allstate Ins. 677 P.2d 1331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Talley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 670 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Talley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 670 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Karp v. Speizer 647 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Karp v. Speizer 647 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
We address first a procedural matter raised by appellees in their answering briefs
Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 609 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1980
Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 609 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1980
has voided such reimbursement provisions as attempts to secure the assignment of personal injury claims which are not assignable under Arizona law.
Gallego v. Strickland 589 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Gallego v. Strickland 589 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
and leaves no room for an exception merely because it is the uninsured motorist who benefits in this case, rather than an insured who has paid an additional premium for medical payments coverage.
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978