DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Garcia, 397 P.2d 214.

30 citing documents.

  • Shano v. Shano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Shano v. Shano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “In civil cases, it is the rule in Arizona that improper admissions into evidence will not be considered as error on appeal, where a case is tried to the judge without a jury, because of the presumption that the trial judge disregarded all inadmissible evidence in reaching his decision.”
  • State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Cameron 704 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Cameron 704 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
    Thus, , found harmless an error admitting evidence otherwise inadmissible when the criminal trial was to the judge, rather than to a jury.
  • State v. Gonzales 523 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Gonzales 523 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Padilla 519 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Padilla 519 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1974
    quoting with approval two Wisconsin cases, Topolewski v. State, 130 Wis.
  • Floral Lakes, Inc. v. Patton 513 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
  • Floral Lakes, Inc. v. Patton 513 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
    Wescott v. Glowenski, 12 Ariz.App.
  • Glubauer v. Smith 458 P.2d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
  • Glubauer v. Smith 458 P.2d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
  • State v. Miranda 450 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Miranda 450 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Fredrico 449 P.2d 936 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Fredrico 449 P.2d 936 Ariz. 1969
    ” , , we held as applicable to criminal cases the civil rule regarding improper admissions before a judge sitting as both the trier of fact and law.
  • State v. Gunther & Shirley Company 423 P.2d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • State v. Gunther & Shirley Company 423 P.2d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • State v. Skinner 422 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • State v. Skinner 422 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • Garcia v. Eyman 417 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • Garcia v. Eyman 417 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • Norvelle v. Lucas 415 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • Norvelle v. Lucas 415 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
    When evidence is erroneously admitted by a trial court sitting without a jury, the court is presumed to have ignored such testimony, , and in this case the record clearly discloses that the court did just that.
  • State v. Garcia 412 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • State v. Garcia 412 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • Johnson v. Hill 402 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
  • Johnson v. Hill 402 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
    When a case is tried to the court without a jury, even though improper evidence is offered and received, if the competent evidence is sufficient to support the judgment it will be sustained regardless of the error.” See also, Bonine v. Bonine (1961), , ; State v. Garcia (1964), , .