DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mills, 396 P.2d 5.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (“The gist of the offense [of theft by false pretenses] .
  • State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez 307 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez 307 P.3d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
    148 Ariz. at 444, 715 P.2d at 300
  • State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • State v. Sharma 165 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • State v. Bonney 701 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Bonney 701 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Fierson 705 P.2d 1338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Fierson 705 P.2d 1338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Jahns 653 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Jahns 653 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
    a case discussing the predecessor statute: “Although there is authority for the proposition that an actual financial loss is necessary to constitute the crime of theft by false pretenses [citations omitted], we think the better rule is that there is no requirement that the victim suffer a pecuniar
  • State v. Agnew 647 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Agnew 647 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Duffy 603 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
  • State v. Duffy 603 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
    State v. Joseph, 20 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Cassius 515 P.2d 903 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
  • State v. Cassius 515 P.2d 903 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
  • State v. Parra 459 P.2d 344 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
  • State v. Parra 459 P.2d 344 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
    6 , (contributing to delinquency of minor, permitting life and helth (sic)’of child to be neglected and failure to provide) , (rape and incest) , (possession of marijuana and possession of marijuana for sale) , (two counts of obtaining money by false pretenses) “ , which holds the statute does not apply to charges of robbery and assault with a deadly weapon.
  • State v. Martin 412 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • State v. Martin 412 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
    the defendants were convicted on two Counts of receiving money by false pretenses.
  • State v. Arriola 409 P.2d 37 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Arriola 409 P.2d 37 Ariz. 1965