Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Patton v. FIRST FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N, ETC., 578 P.2d 152.

62 citing documents.

Phillips v. Superior Court 692 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Phillips v. Superior Court 692 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
The enforceability of a due-on-sale clause in a
State v. Bolt 689 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1984
Scappaticci v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 662 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1983
& Loan Ass’n, , we relied on both Ham and A.R.S.
Ledesma v. PIONEER NAT. TITLE INS. CO. 629 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Deno v. Transamerica Title Insurance 617 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Cluff v. Farmers Insurance Ex *529 change, 10 Ariz.App.
Schoonover v. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. 616 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Schoonover v. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. 616 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
We are aware of the Arizona Supreme Court’s , that the deed of trust statutory provisions must be strictly construed in favor of the borrower.
Continental Life & Accident Co. v. Songer 603 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
r Arizona law, which does recognize the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress, 9 one may recover such damages “only where the defendant’s acts are ‘so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.’ ” Patton v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, , 476, , 155 (1978); Cluff v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 10 Ariz.App.
Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Minneapolis 271 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1978

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by