Cited by

Co., (“Appellant argues that [gross negligence] is a tort wholly separate from negligence.

Co., (“A railroad company is not necessarily free from negligence, even though it may have literally complied with safety statutes or rules; the circumstances may require it to do more.”) (citation omitted); Rossell, 147 Ariz. at 166 (“What usually is done may be evidence of what ought to be done, but what ough

Co., (issues not argued on appeal are deemed waived), and reframed her request for relief under the catch-all provision of Rule 60(b), the grounds for relief in each Rule 60(b) subsection “are separate and distinct.” Gonzalez, 243 Ariz. at 535, ¶ 15.

Co., (issues not argued on appeal were treated as abandoned).

Co., (“Since appellant does not consider these issues as worthy of argument, we consider them as abandoned.”).

Co., (issues not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned); n.1, ¶ 3, n.1 (App. 2003) (appellate court deemed appellant to have abandoned any argument that superior court improperly granted summary judgment on one claim when, on

Co., (issues not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned).

Co., (issues not argued on appeal treated as abandoned).

Co., (holding that issues which are not clearly raised and argued by a party in his appellate brief are waived); Belen Loan Investors, ¶ 22, (same).

Co., (issues not argued on appeal deemed abandoned).

Co., , (citing ARCAP 13(a)(6)).

Co., , (issues not argued on appeal are deemed waived).

Co., P.2d 759 (1979) (issues not argued on appeal deemed abandoned).

Wanton misconduct is “aggravated negligence.”

Although some early decisions may not have clearly defined willful or wanton misconduct, any ambiguity was resolved in DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co. , (“[I]t is settled that wanton misconduct is aggravated negligence.”)

Wareing, 182 Ariz. at 498-99 , 897 P.2d at 1384-85 ( , ).