Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wiedmaier v. Industrial Commission, 589 P.2d 1.

25 citing documents.

Al Jajo v. arrowhead/benchmark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Landon v. Industrial Commission 375 P.3d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Landon v. Industrial Commission 375 P.3d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, (noting that if economic conditions are the sole cause of unemployment, then there is no right to an award for lost earning capacity) (emphasis added)).3 Accordingly, the second sentence in subsection (D) (addressing the situation where termination is caused for reasons unrelated to the industrial injury)
Carr v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Carr v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
But cf. Matlock v. Industrial Comm’n, , (average monthly wage of a ranch-hand included the value of a “house, utilities, milk, butter, eggs and meat” furnished by the employer as part of the employee’s compensation), overruled on other grounds, Wiedmaier v. Industrial Comm’n
Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
ARIZONA DPS v. Industrial Com'n 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
ARIZONA DPS v. Industrial Com'n 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
Zimmerman, 137 Ariz. at 580-83 , 672 P.2d at 924-27
Arizona Department of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 861 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1993
Zimmerman, 137 Ariz. at 580-83 , 672 P.2d at 924-27
Pennell v. Industrial Commission 731 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Pennell v. Industrial Commission 731 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
(if economic conditions are the sole cause of unemployment, then there is no right to an award for lost earning capacity).
D'AMICO v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 717 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
D'AMICO v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 717 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
See, , and cases cited therein.
Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 407 Ariz. 1986
Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial Commission 716 P.2d 407 Ariz. 1986
See Laker v. Industrial Commission, supra
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 716 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
A third distinction is that although an unscheduled award may take into account other employment available to the workman in his disabled condition, -29 , -3 (1978), a scheduled injury is compensated without regard to what other employment may be available.
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 659 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1983
A third distinction is that although an unscheduled award may take into account other employment available to the workman in his disabled condition, -29 , -3 (1978), a scheduled injury is compensated without regard to what other employment may be available.
United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Commission 640 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Commission 640 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Franco v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 633 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Franco v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 633 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
See, e. g., , and cases cited therein.