Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cohen v. State, 588 P.2d 299.

82 citing documents.

State v. Wagstaff 794 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1990
State v. Wagstaff 794 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1990
State v. Dykes 789 P.2d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Dykes 789 P.2d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Prentiss 786 P.2d 932 Ariz. 1989
State v. Prentiss 786 P.2d 932 Ariz. 1989
For Deannexation v. City of Goodyear 773 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
For Deannexation v. City of Goodyear 773 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Clay v. Town of Gilbert 773 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Clay v. Town of Gilbert 773 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
(“The test for severability is ...
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Rambeau 730 P.2d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Rambeau 730 P.2d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Tabora v. State 722 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Tabora v. State 722 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
adopted in part, vacated in part
Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
No such prohibition, however, applies to laws that operate on pre-existing conditions, and such laws are not retrospective by their mere relation to antecedent conditions.” , (emphasis added).
Harrison v. Ellis 704 P.2d 1367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Harrison v. Ellis 704 P.2d 1367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 697 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1985
Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 697 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1985
City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agr.
Corrigan v. City of Scottsdale 720 P.2d 528 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Corrigan v. City of Scottsdale 720 P.2d 528 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Seven G Ranching Co. v. Stewart Title & Trust, , , aff'd, in part, vacated in part, , Payne v. Payne, 12 Ariz.App.
State v. Sweet 693 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1985
State v. Sweet 693 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1985
It is also helpful and proper to “turn to the overall purposes and aims of the legislature in enacting the statute in order to glean the legislative intent____”
State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
275, 280-81 , 7 L.Ed.2d 285, 292 (1961)
State v. Jones 689 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Jones 689 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Book-Cellar, Inc. 679 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Book-Cellar, Inc. 679 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984