Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Keck v. Jackson, 593 P.2d 668.

62 citing documents.

Torres v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Torres v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(concluding that damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress are recoverable if caused by the defendant’s negligence).
Odriozola v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Odriozola v. Wood Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Viking v. Link Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Viking v. Link Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 7 (App. 1999) (–16 (1979)).
Lockerby v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lockerby v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Rodriguez v. Fox News Network, LLC, ¶ 7 (App. 2015).
April Abigail Guerra v. State of Arizona 348 P.3d 423 Ariz. 2015
Snyder v. banner/goel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Snyder v. banner/goel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kaufman v. Langhofer 222 P.3d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Kaufman v. Langhofer 222 P.3d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Roman , the issue was whether the plaintiff was entitled to damages under the Arizona Supreme Court’s , for the negligent infliction of emotional distress when she saw another dog "dismember” her pet poodle.
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
the county points out that "Arizona courts have long held that a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress requires a showing of bodily injury.” Even assuming a Keck analysis would apply to Vasquez's claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, it does not apply to her separa
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Connolly 132 P.3d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Connolly 132 P.3d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
y. ¶ 10 To state a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim arising from witnessing another person’s injury or death, a plaintiff must establish that she was within the “zone of danger,” and “must prove physical injury resulting from the shock of witnessing injury to a closely related person.” , -16 , -70 (1979).
Engler v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 2005
Hislop v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 5 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Hislop v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 5 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
*269 ANALYSIS ¶ 10 , our supreme court held that a person could recover for emotional distress caused by witnessing an injury to a non-family member.
Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern Arizona 995 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern Arizona 995 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Duke v. Cochise County 938 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Duke v. Cochise County 938 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Gau v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 901 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Gau v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 901 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Morton v. Maricopa County 865 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Morton v. Maricopa County 865 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Moreover, none established a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress damages, absent evidence the emotional distress was “manifested as a physical injury.”
Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Development & Management, Inc. 795 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Development & Management, Inc. 795 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
See, e.g., Bank of America v. J. & S. Auto Repairs
Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc. 801 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
Co., , -16 , -70 (1979).
Ball v. Prentice 781 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Ball v. Prentice 781 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
While there was some uncertainty about the right to recover damages for emotional distress without some physical injury or “impact” , , there was little doubt that one could recover damages for emotional distress and accompanying physical injury as a result of a- tortfeasor’s negligence when one was physically involved in an accident and suffered some impact triggerin
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Co., , -16 , -70 (1979).
Rowland v. Union Hills Country Club 757 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Rowland v. Union Hills Country Club 757 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp. 752 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp. 752 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
see also Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 783 F.2d 589 (5th Cir.1986); Nutt v. A.C.
Quinn v. Turner 745 P.2d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Quinn v. Turner 745 P.2d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
DeStories v. City of Phoenix 744 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
DeStories v. City of Phoenix 744 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In the context of a claim for damages for mental anguish suffered as a result of physical harm negligently inflicted on another, , adopted Restatement (Second) of Torts § 313: (1) If the actor unintentionally causes emotional, distress to another, he is subject to liability to the other for resulting illness or bodily harm if the actor (a) should have realized that his conduct involved an unreasonable risk of causing the dis
Rutledge v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 715 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Rutledge v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 715 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc. 688 P.2d 605 Ariz. 1984