DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Kruchten, 417 P.2d 510.

155 citing documents.

  • State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    A defendant has only met this burden “when it is shown that the proceedings were a farce or a sham.” ().
  • State v. Walen 563 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1997
  • Waitkus v. Mauet 757 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • Waitkus v. Mauet 757 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
    See State v. Lawonn, supra; , cert.
  • Hitch v. Pima County Superior Court 708 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1985
  • Hitch v. Pima County Superior Court 708 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1985
    In case of conflict, the former must yield to the latter.”
  • State v. Sutton 693 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Sutton 693 P.2d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    The issue, then, is whether this defendant’s claim that trial counsel misinformed him as to the maximum sentence he faced if convicted, thereby inducing him to enter a plea of guilty, stated a “colorable claim.” , cert.
  • State v. Cruz-Mata 674 P.2d 1368 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Cruz-Mata 674 P.2d 1368 Ariz. 1983
    -64, -34 (1975); , (construing 17 A.R.S.
  • State v. Hartford 651 P.2d 856 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Hartford 651 P.2d 856 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Bravo 639 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Bravo 639 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Tison 633 P.2d 355 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Tison 633 P.2d 355 Ariz. 1981
  • Rodriguez v. State 628 P.2d 950 Ariz. 1981
  • Rodriguez v. State 628 P.2d 950 Ariz. 1981
    Accord, , Watson v. District Court in and for Fourth Jud., Colo.
  • State v. Moreno 625 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Moreno 625 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1981
    Appellant would also have us reject the current standard by which we weigh claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; that is, whether the proceedings were rendered a sham or mockery of justice, , , cert.
  • State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
    State v. Clayton, 109 Ariz. [587], , , ” 121 Ariz. at 198, .
  • State v. Flewellen 621 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1980
  • Criticized State v. Flewellen 621 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1980
    In reviewing the work of counsel, we are reminded of the statement from United States v. Stoecker, 7th Cir., 216 F.2d 51, 52 , , : Advocacy is a skill and art; easy to criticize, difficult to fairly appraise.
  • State v. Alaffa 617 P.2d 525 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Alaffa 617 P.2d 525 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Williams 593 P.2d 896 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Williams 593 P.2d 896 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Valencia 589 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Valencia 589 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Pacheco 588 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Pacheco 588 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1978
    In Arizona, a conviction must be set aside if the representation afforded by counsel is so ineffective that it can be characterized as amounting to a “farce or a sham.” , cert, denied, 385 U.S. 1043 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Huizar 543 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Huizar 543 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Bell 540 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
  • State v. Bell 540 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
  • State v. Farni 539 P.2d 889 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Farni 539 P.2d 889 Ariz. 1975
    We have repeatedly noted Arizona law on this point : “ * * * [I]t is well established that the accused is bound by the trial strategy, misconduct and mistakes of counsel so long as counsel’s assistance at trial was not reduced to a mere ‘farce or sham.’ Bouchard v. United States, 344 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1965); Kruchten v. Eyman, 406 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1969); State v. Kruchten, 101 Ariz.' 186, * * at 550 , at 982 (1974).
  • State v. Ybarra 527 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
  • State v. Ybarra 527 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
    See, , Sanchez v. Nelson, 446 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1971).
  • Griswold v. Gomes 523 P.2d 490 Ariz. 1974
  • Griswold v. Gomes 523 P.2d 490 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Tellez 523 P.2d 62 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Tellez 523 P.2d 62 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Rogers 521 P.2d 1128 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Rogers 521 P.2d 1128 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Jones 521 P.2d 978 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Jones 521 P.2d 978 Ariz. 1974
    Furthermore, it is well established that the accused is bound by the trial strategy, misconduct and mistakes of counsel so long as counsel’s assistance at trial was not reduced to a mere “farce or sham.” Bouchard v. United States, 344 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1965); Kruchten v. Eyman, 406 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1969); , cert denied, 385 U.S. 1043 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ebert 519 P.2d 1149 Ariz. 1974