Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Narten, 407 P.2d 81.

98 citing documents.

State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
State v. Harwood, supra; , , State v. Schantz, supra.
State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1973
State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1973
State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
Penaskovic v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 513 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Penaskovic v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 513 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Cordova 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
State v. Cordova 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
State v. Taylor 508 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
State v. Taylor 508 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
898 , 27 L.Ed.2d 818 (1971); , cert.
State v. Moore 506 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1973
State v. Moore 506 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1973
State v. Endreson 506 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
State v. Endreson 506 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
State v. Basurto 501 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
State v. Basurto 501 P.2d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
State v. Gregory 501 P.2d 387 Ariz. 1972
State v. Gregory 501 P.2d 387 Ariz. 1972
It has long been the rule in Arizona that counsel for both sides have considerable latitude in their arguments to the jury, , , cert.
State v. Guthrie 496 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1972
State v. Guthrie 496 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1972
State v. Schmid 484 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1971
State v. Schmid 484 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1971
State v. Mojarro Padilla 483 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1971
State v. Mojarro Padilla 483 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1971
75 , 9 L.Ed.2d 79 (1962) , has held that there must be a showing of prejudice before a denial of a challenge to a jury will be considered error.
State v. Altman 482 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
State v. Altman 482 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
State v. Zimmer 472 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1970
State v. Zimmer 472 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1970
State v. Taylor 451 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Taylor 451 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965)
State v. Chaney 428 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Chaney 428 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
The proof, viewed favorably to support the verdicts rendered below, , cert.
State v. Martin 426 P.2d 639 Ariz. 1967
State v. Martin 426 P.2d 639 Ariz. 1967
State v. McGill 419 P.2d 499 Ariz. 1966
State v. McGill 419 P.2d 499 Ariz. 1966
State v. Intogna 419 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1966
State v. Webb 419 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1966
State v. Intogna 419 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1966
defendant offered psychiatric testimony showing the absence of a specific mental state, though not amounting to legal insanity.
State v. Webb 419 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1966
State v. Janovic 417 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1966
State v. Kruchten 417 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1966
State v. Kruchten 417 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1966
Criticized State v. Janovic 417 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1966
Mental disorders less extensive than required by the rule in M’Naghten’s case are not admissible to a jury on a plea of not guilty, , , and could only be considered in a capital case on a plea of guilty on a hearing in mitigation.