Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Staffco, Inc. v. Maricopa Trading Co., 595 P.2d 31.
- Fen v. Fonzi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Fen v. Fonzi
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Richas, 133 Ariz. at 514; Staffco
- Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Evers v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Evers v. Rose
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Duckstein, 230 Ariz. at 231, ¶ 8 (citing Staffco, ).
- Duckstein v. Wolf 282 P.3d 428 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Duckstein v. Wolf
282 P.3d 428
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See Staffco, , (interpreting Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c) which is substantially the same as Rule 85(C)).
- Porter v. Spader 239 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Porter v. Spader 239 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. Naranjo 79 P.3d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-
Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. Naranjo
79 P.3d 1206
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
1966, encourage the joinder of all appropriate parties in a single suit to avoid multiplicity of litigation.”); see also Staffco, , (“The thrust of ...
- West v. State 58 P.3d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
-
West v. State
58 P.3d 28
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
254, 255 , see also Staffco, , (“The thrust of ...
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & Roca 902 P.2d 1354 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Commercial Union Insurance v. Lewis & Roca
902 P.2d 1354
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
18; Staffco, , (stating that the main purpose of our civil procedure rules for joinder is to dispose of all claims in one action whenever possible); Malta v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co., , (“A plaintiff is not permitted to split his claim and harass an advers
- Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 893 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP.
893 P.2d 46
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Staffco, , , 34 *54 (1979).
- R.A.J. v. L.B.V. 817 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- Raj v. Lbv 817 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Raj v. Lbv
817 P.2d 37
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc., , Staffco
-
R.A.J. v. L.B.V.
817 P.2d 37
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc., , Staffco
- Sertich v. Moorman 783 P.2d 1199 Ariz. 1989
- Sertich v. Moorman 783 P.2d 1199 Ariz. 1989
- Healey v. Coury 783 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Healey v. Coury 783 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. 724 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. 724 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- United Farm Workers v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board 716 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- United Farm Workers v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board 716 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- Skousen v. W.C. Olsen Investment Co. 717 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- Skousen v. W.C. Olsen Investment Co. 717 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- Garcia v. State 713 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Garcia v. State
713 P.2d 347
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
(addressing Rule 60(c)); see also Crowe v. Miller, 27 Ariz.App.
- Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1984
-
Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc.
688 P.2d 637
Ariz. 1984
Without a showing of an abuse of discretion, we will not disturb a trial court’s decision on a motion to set aside a judgment, see, e.g., Staffco
- French v. Angelic 669 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
French v. Angelic
669 P.2d 1021
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Union Oil Co. v. Hud *246 son Oil Co., 131 Ariz. at 288 , 640 P.2d at 850 ; Staffco, , , Walker v. Kendig, 107 Ariz. at 513 , 489 P.2d at 852 ; Camacho v. Gardner, 104 Ariz. at 559 , 456 P.2d at 929 .
- Roberts v. Morgensen Motors 659 P.2d 1307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Roberts v. Morgensen Motors 659 P.2d 1307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Union Oil Co. of California v. Hudson Oil Co. 640 P.2d 847 Ariz. 1982
-
Union Oil Co. of California v. Hudson Oil Co.
640 P.2d 847
Ariz. 1982
Staffco, , , Walker v. Kendig, 107 Ariz. at *289 513, 489 P.2d at 852 ; Camacho v. Gardner, 104 Ariz. at 559 , 456 P.2d at 929 .
- Allen v. Allen 628 P.2d 995 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
-
Allen v. Allen
628 P.2d 995
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
A minute entry was also held to be a rendition of judgment in Staffco, Inc. v. *115 Maricopa County Trading Company
- Associated Grocers v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Associated Grocers v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews 612 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews
612 P.2d 511
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Staffco, , Ashton v. Sierrita Mining and Ranching, 21 Ariz.App.