Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bouldin v. Turek, 607 P.2d 954.

84 citing documents.

Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Under the exception a statute does have retroactive effect if it is merely procedural and does not affect an earlier established substantive right.”
Solar-West, Inc. v. Falk 687 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Solar-West, Inc. v. Falk 687 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Boulware v. Carbajal 673 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Boulware v. Carbajal 673 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
the court stated: “Any inquiry into the effect of a statute on antecedent events must have as its touchstone a consideration of A.R.S.
Abrams v. Horizon Corp. 669 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1983
Abrams v. Horizon Corp. 669 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1983
“Under the exception a statute does have retroactive effect if it is merely procedural and does not affect an earlier established substantive right.”
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Goubeaux 664 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Goubeaux 664 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1983
Bush v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 667 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Bush v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 667 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Kaibab Shop v. Desert Son, Inc. 662 P.2d 452 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Kaibab Shop v. Desert Son, Inc. 662 P.2d 452 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc. 665 P.2d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc. 665 P.2d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
See Gressley v. Patterson Tillage & Leveling, Inc.
Walters v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 641 P.2d 235 Ariz. 1982
Walters v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 641 P.2d 235 Ariz. 1982
we held that § 12-341.01 does not apply to suits commenced before its effective date.
Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc. 633 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1981
Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc. 633 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1981
The Court of Appeals, , affirmed that part of the judgment based on the trial court’s directed verdicts, reversed the order awarding attorneys’ , and affirmed the order conditionally granting a new trial on the issue of damages only.
Tovrea v. Trails End Improvement Ass'n 634 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tovrea v. Trails End Improvement Ass'n 634 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Flieger v. Ash 624 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Flieger v. Ash 624 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc. 633 P.2d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc. 633 P.2d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Our holding in Stephens , however
Mission Bank v. Kutko 603 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1979
Mission Bank v. Kutko 603 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1979