Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Home Insurance v. Industrial Commission, 599 P.2d 801.

73 citing documents.

Hunt Bldg. Corp. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 713 P.2d 303 Ariz. 1986
Nation v. Weiner 701 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Nation v. Weiner 701 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
This evidence should include: “The duration of the employment; the method of payment; who furnishes necessary equipment; the right to hire and fire; who bears responsibility for workmen’s compensation insurance; the extent to which the employer may exercise control over the details of the work....”
Hunt Building Corp. v. Industrial Commission 713 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Hunt Building Corp. v. Industrial Commission 713 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Molnar v. Industrial Commission 687 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Anton v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 688 P.2d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Molnar v. Industrial Commission 687 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
the supreme court discussed the doctrine of “right of control”: To determine the right to control, courts look to the totality of the facts and circumstances of each case, examining various indicia of control.
Anton v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 688 P.2d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Co. v. Industri *569 al Commission
Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc. 690 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc. 690 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 (1957).
Shockey v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 680 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Shockey v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 680 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Magma Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 1387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Magma Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 675 P.2d 1387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Considered in a light most favorable to sustaining the Industrial Commission’s award, , the relevant facts are as follows: Respondent was employed as an underground miner at the Magma Copper Company in San Manuel, Arizona.
Special Fund of the Industrial Commission v. Catalina Trucking Co. 658 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Special Fund of the Industrial Commission v. Catalina Trucking Co. 658 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Greenway, Etc. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Greenway Baptist Church v. Industrial Commission 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Greenway Baptist Church v. Industrial Commission 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Greenway, Etc. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 636 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Frank E. Basil, Inc. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 634 P.2d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Frank E. Basil, Inc. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 634 P.2d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
The facts, viewed in a light most favorable to sustaining the award, , are as follows.