Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Jurek v. Jurek, 606 P.2d 812.

59 citing documents.

Brumbaugh v. Pet Inc. 628 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Juniel v. Juniel 623 P.2d 848 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Juniel v. Juniel 623 P.2d 848 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
in awarding to appellee as her sole and separate property the net proceeds of any recovery in a pending superior court action against the City of Tucson for personal injuries she sustained.
Alley v. Dorame 613 P.2d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Alley v. Dorame 613 P.2d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
has eliminated the only legitimate reason that existed for following the doctrine.
Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
In Re the Marriage of Kosko 611 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
In Re the Marriage of Kosko 611 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Recently, however, the Arizona Supreme Court, , held that the ownership of a recovery for personal injury in a dissolution proceeding is dependent upon the nature of its component parts.
Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980