Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite AG Rancho Equipment Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 598 P.2d 100.

25 citing documents.

Takamiya v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Takamiya v. Loiselle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
Alvares v. Munguia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Alvares v. Munguia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
Evou v. All In Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Evou v. All In Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., (“The power to impose [Rule 37] sanctions .
North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 12 NORTH et al. v. VPS et al. Decision of the Court -23 (1979)).
Floare v. Damian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Followed Floare v. Damian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
In Re the ESTATE OF FRANCES B. LEWIS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In Re the ESTATE OF FRANCES B. LEWIS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., -24, -02 (1979)
Graf v. Whitaker 966 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Graf v. Whitaker 966 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
See, e.g., AG Rancho Equipment Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., -23 , -01 (1979).
White v. Lewis 804 P.2d 805 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Nesmith v. Superior Court 790 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Nesmith v. Superior Court 790 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
1087, 1094 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1255, 1264-65 (1958); AG Rancho Equipment v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., , Birds Int’l
Robinson v. Higuera 760 P.2d 622 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Robinson v. Higuera 760 P.2d 622 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
Verde Ditch Co. v. James 758 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Verde Ditch Co. v. James 758 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., -124 , -02 (1979) (default entered after defendants failed to respond to plaintiffs’ interrogatories in disobedience of order compelling discovery) -41 , -87 (App.1983) (default entered after defendants failed to appear *372 at the
Austin v. City of Scottsdale 684 P.2d 151 Ariz. 1984
Austin v. City of Scottsdale 684 P.2d 151 Ariz. 1984
The sanction of dismissal, though within the sound discretion of the trial court, A. G. Rancho Equipment Co. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., , is “harsh and not to be invoked except under extreme circumstances,” Buchanan v. Jimenez, 18 Ariz.App.
Birds International Corp. v. Arizona Maintenance Co. 662 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Birds International Corp. v. Arizona Maintenance Co. 662 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Rancho Equipment v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., , Zakroff v. May, 8 Ariz.App.