Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sato v. Van Denburgh, 599 P.2d 181.

107 citing documents.

Corral v. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance 630 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
in which the Arizona Supreme Court stated: “When defendant files a properly supported motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff is obligated to present, either by affidavit or some other evidence, facts controverting the defendant’s affidavit.” Id.
Portonova v. Wilkinson 627 P.2d 232 Ariz. 1981
Portonova v. Wilkinson 627 P.2d 232 Ariz. 1981
Long v. Buckley 629 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Long v. Buckley 629 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
(Discovery rule applied to negligent performance of accounting services).
Desruisseau v. Cameron 611 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Desruisseau v. Cameron 611 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980