Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rimondi v. Briggs, 606 P.2d 412.

49 citing documents.

Chongtanalertporn v. Brocato Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Chongtanalertporn v. Brocato Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Prejudice will not be presumed but must “affirmatively appear from the record.”
Taraska v. Taraska Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Taraska v. Taraska Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Prejudice will not be presumed but must “affirmatively appear from the record.” see Borg, 3 Ariz. App. at 277.
Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Day v. Armendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Day v. Armendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Noguero v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Noguero v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(concluding that the witness did not provide expert testimony because he related his observations but did not testify on what actually caused the accident).
Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The prejudice “must affirmatively appear from the record.”
State v. Humelhans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Humelhans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
STATE v. HUMELHANS Decision of the Court condition, that there were ever any fingerprints on it.5 Humelhans does not clearly articulate the basis for this argument, but we will not overturn a trial court’s ruling on the admission or exclusion of evidence “unless a clear abuse of discretion appears and prejudice results therefrom.”
hertz/coy v. Coy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
hertz/coy v. Coy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
The prejudice “must affirmatively appear from the record.”
Butler v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Butler v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young, , , (trial court has considerable discretion in ruling on the admission of photographs).
Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd. 9 P.3d 314 Ariz. 2000
Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd. 9 P.3d 314 Ariz. 2000
(citing several Arizona cases in which such an analysis has been applied).
Pizziconi v. Yarbrough 868 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Pizziconi v. Yarbrough 868 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(absent prejudice, rulings on the admission or exclusion of evidence will not be reversed).
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 861 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 861 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Its provisions are not violated by instructions, such as the following, which are permissive and leave the plaintiff’s recovery to the discretion of the jury if it finds that the plaintiff was negligent or assumed the risk: “[Pjlaintiff should not recover.” , and cases cited therein.
Jepson v. New 792 P.2d 728 Ariz. 1990
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Catchings v. City of Glendale 743 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Catchings v. City of Glendale 743 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Hallmark v. Allied Products Corp., supra.
Duran v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 726 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Duran v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 726 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Groener v. Briehl 661 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Groener v. Briehl 661 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
the Arizona Supreme Court said that only an expert witness may testify as to the ultimate cause of an accident.
Dunlap v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc. 666 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Dunlap v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc. 666 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Selby v. Savard 655 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1982
Selby v. Savard 655 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1982
Hallmark v. Allied Products Corp. 646 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Hallmark v. Allied Products Corp. 646 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Sequoia Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Halec Construction Co., Inc.
State v. Navarro 645 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Navarro 645 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Walters v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 641 P.2d 235 Ariz. 1982
Walters v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 641 P.2d 235 Ariz. 1982
State v. Hodge 638 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Hodge 638 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc. 624 P.2d 296 Ariz. 1981
Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc. 624 P.2d 296 Ariz. 1981