Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite All American School Supply Co. v. Slavens, 609 P.2d 46.

27 citing documents.

Metro Phx Bank v. Rpm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Metro Phx Bank v. Rpm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See, (“Arizona has long held that damages for breach of contract are those damages which arise naturally from the breach itself or which may reasonably be supposed to have been within the contemplation of the parties at the time they entered the contract.”).
Fst Farms v. Vanderwey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fst Farms v. Vanderwey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
and the same is true for damages for breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, ¶ 15 (App. 2006).
Sullivan v. Homes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sullivan v. Homes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(“Arizona has long held that damages for breach of contract are those damages which arise naturally from the breach itself or which may reasonably be supposed to have been within the contemplation of the parties at the time they entered the contract.”).
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Bondwriter Southwest, Inc. 263 P.3d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Bondwriter Southwest, Inc. 263 P.3d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. v. Schwindt 833 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1992
Edwards v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc. 753 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Edwards v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc. 753 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
All Points Towing, Inc. v. City of Glendale 735 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
All Points Towing, Inc. v. City of Glendale 735 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
[must] reasonably be supposed to have been within the contemplation of the parties at the time they entered the contract.”
Short v. Riley 724 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Short v. Riley 724 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Both parties agree that the rule for assessing damages in a contract action permits recovery of “those damages which arise naturally from the breach itself or which may reasonably be supposed to have been within the contemplation of the parties at the time they entered the contract.”
City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Employment Relations Board Ex Rel. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees … 699 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Employment Relations Board Ex Rel. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees … 699 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
ELAR INVESTMENTS v. Southwest Culvert Co. 676 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
ELAR INVESTMENTS v. Southwest Culvert Co. 676 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Southern Arizona School for Boys
Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc. 638 P.2d 210 Ariz. 1981
Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc. 638 P.2d 210 Ariz. 1981
3 , D. Dobbs, Remedies § 12.3 (1973).
All American School Supply Co. v. Slavens 625 P.2d 324 Ariz. 1981
All American School Supply Co. v. Slavens 625 P.2d 324 Ariz. 1981
General Acrylics v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
General Acrylics v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980