Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cuzick, 397 P.2d 629.
- State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Reed
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(finding a waiver of counsel remains valid through sentencing absent a showing the defendant changed his or her mind and requested counsel).
- State v. Starks 512 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
- State v. Starks 512 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
- Gantt v. Eyman 475 P.2d 476 Ariz. 1970
-
Gantt v. Eyman
475 P.2d 476
Ariz. 1970
*296 See also: , State v. Arce, 6 Ariz.App.
- State v. Linsner 467 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1970
-
State v. Linsner
467 P.2d 238
Ariz. 1970
We do not think this necessarily constitutes an abuse of discretion considering the defendant’s past criminal activities, the nature of the offenses here involved, and his consistent antisocial attitudes, , .
- State v. Howland 439 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1968
- State v. Howland 439 P.2d 821 Ariz. 1968
- State v. Cuzick 428 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
State v. Cuzick
428 P.2d 443
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
The defendant Jack Cuzick and his brother William F. Cuzick ( , [1964]), were apprehended in a building in the nighttime.
- Cuzick v. State 421 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- Cuzick v. State 421 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- State v. Benn 418 P.2d 589 Ariz. 1966
-
State v. Benn
418 P.2d 589
Ariz. 1966
“Where the statute is constitutional under which a sentence is imposed, no sentence within the statutory limit is per se deemed to be cruel and unusual.” , .
- State v. Fierro 416 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Fierro 416 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Owen 410 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
-
State v. Owen
410 P.2d 698
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Eyman v. McPherson, 1 Ariz.App.
- State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 409 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 409 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- State v. Fullen 404 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
-
State v. Fullen
404 P.2d 732
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
The ■court also pointed out that defendant in Miranda had a record which indicated he was not without court experience
- State v. Wallace 403 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Wallace
403 P.2d 550
Ariz. 1965
State v. Quintana, supra
- State v. Sherrick 402 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Sherrick 402 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Miranda 401 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Miranda 401 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1965