Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Scales v. City Court of City of Mesa, 594 P.2d 97.

86 citing documents.

State v. Superior Court 718 P.2d 171 Ariz. 1986
State v. Superior Court 718 P.2d 171 Ariz. 1986
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1986
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1986
WAIVER Appellants, , argue that the state had a duty to preserve the breath sample taken from them because its destruction “deprives the defendant of a crucial source of evidence with which to attack the validity of the test reading and hence the presumption.” 122 Ariz. at 234 , 594 P.2d at 100 .
State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 718 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 718 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
The Frye test, as adopted in Arizona, is as follows: “To be accepted by a court as fact, a scientific principle must have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.”
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
our supreme court held that the test ampul used in a breathalyzer must be retained.
Jhagroo v. City of Phoenix 694 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Jhagroo v. City of Phoenix 694 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
the defendants contended it was a violation of their due process rights to allow introduction of breathalyzer test results where the test ampoules which yielded those results had been routinely destroyed by the police department and were unavailable for inspection and analysis.
Oshrin v. Coulter 688 P.2d 1001 Ariz. 1984
Oshrin v. Coulter 688 P.2d 1001 Ariz. 1984
1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission 686 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission 686 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Hauss 688 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Hauss 688 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Mitchell 683 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Mitchell 683 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 644 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1982
Lemieux v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 644 P.2d 1300 Ariz. 1982
Lemieux v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 644 P.2d 1300 Ariz. 1982
Collins, supra; Mena, supra
State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 644 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1982
People v. Kelly, 17 Cal.3d 24 , 130 Cal.Rptr.
State v. City Court 635 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. City Court 635 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Collins 635 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Collins 635 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Prior to trial, the court ruled that the state could not introduce into evidence breathalyzer test results
State v. Mena 624 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mena 624 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1981
see People v. Kelly, 17 Cal.3d 24 , 130 Cal.Rptr.
State v. Schilleman 609 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1980
State v. Schilleman 609 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1980
State v. Soloman 607 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1980
State v. Soloman 607 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1980
Baca v. Smith 604 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1979
Baca v. Smith 604 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1979
On April 18 of this year