Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co., 604 P.2d 1124.

32 citing documents.

Nicdon v. Desert Mountain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nicdon v. Desert Mountain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sunburst Farms v. Braden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sunburst Farms v. Braden Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dreamland Villa Community Club, Inc. v. Raimey 226 P.3d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dreamland Villa Community Club, Inc. v. Raimey 226 P.3d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., Inc., , (noting that, by purchasing property within the subdivision, lot owners became bound by the restrictions in the subdivision’s declaration); Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, , (explaining that assent to deed restrictions is eq
Wilson v. Playa De Serrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Wilson v. Playa De Serrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Powell v. Washburn 125 P.3d 373 Ariz. 2006
Powell v. Washburn 125 P.3d 373 Ariz. 2006
Co., (“This court has previously recognized that in determining the meaning of restrictive covenants, the surrounding circumstances will be looked to as well as the meani
Vales v. KINGS HILL CONDOMINIUM ASS'N 125 P.3d 381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Vales v. KINGS HILL CONDOMINIUM ASS'N 125 P.3d 381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Co., , (quoting Grossman v. Hatley, 21 Ariz.App.
Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. II 87 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. II 87 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Shamrock v. Wagon Wheel Park Homeowners Ass'n 75 P.3d 132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Shamrock v. Wagon Wheel Park Homeowners Ass'n 75 P.3d 132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Co., , Hueg v. Sunburst Farms (Glendale) Mut.
GARDEN LAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Madigan 62 P.3d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
GARDEN LAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Madigan 62 P.3d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Scholten v. Blackhawk Partners 909 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Scholten v. Blackhawk Partners 909 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co. Inc., , (quoting Grossman v. Hatley, 21 Ariz.App.
Arizona Biltmore Estates Ass'n v. Tezak 868 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Arizona Biltmore Estates Ass'n v. Tezak 868 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
As the Arizona Supreme Court has said: “Restrictive covenants are to be strictly construed against persons seeking to enforce them and any ambiguities or doubts as to their effect should be resolved in favor of the free use and enjoyment of the property and against restrictions.” Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co., Inc., , (quoting Grossman v. Hatley, 21 Ariz.App.
Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Tenhoff 745 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Tenhoff 745 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Camelback Del Este Home-Owners Ass'n v. Warner 749 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Camelback Del Este Home-Owners Ass'n v. Warner 749 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Company, Inc., -17 , -28 (1979).
Shalimar Ass'n v. D.O.C. Enterprises, Ltd. 688 P.2d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Shalimar Ass'n v. D.O.C. Enterprises, Ltd. 688 P.2d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Company, Inc., , Palermo v. Allen; O’ , Carter v. Conroy, 25 Ariz.App.
Divizio v. Kewin Enterprises, Inc. 666 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Divizio v. Kewin Enterprises, Inc. 666 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Company, Inc.
Catalina Foothills Estates, Inc. v. Shull 616 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Catalina Foothills Estates, Inc. v. Shull 616 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co.