Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Schumacher, 400 P.2d 584.

48 citing documents.

Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
See also State v. Schumacher, *311 , (Mere conjecture “ ‘certainly cannot amount to the deprivation of a constitutional right.’ ”) (Quoting United States ex rel.
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. J-47735-1 546 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. J-47735-1 546 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
We also indicated that a preliminary examination is not a trial but simply a course of procedure whereby possible abuse of power may be prevented, P.2d 584 (1965).
State ex rel. Berger v. Jennings 520 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1974
State ex rel. Berger v. Jennings 520 P.2d 313 Ariz. 1974
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J—72804 504 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J—72804 504 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Dziggel 492 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Dziggel 492 P.2d 1227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Lenahan, 12 Ariz.App.
In Re Anonymous, Juvenile Court No. 6358-4 484 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
In Re Anonymous, Juvenile Court No. 6358-4 484 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Briley 476 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1970
State v. Briley 476 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1970
State v. Riley 475 P.2d 932 Ariz. 1970
State v. Riley 475 P.2d 932 Ariz. 1970
we passed upon the question of whether the failure to assign counsel at a preliminary hearing was a violation of Sixth Amendment rights.
State v. Miranda 450 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1969
State v. Miranda 450 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1969
State v. Armstrong 440 P.2d 307 Ariz. 1968
State v. Armstrong 440 P.2d 307 Ariz. 1968
State v. Forteson 434 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1967
State v. Forteson 434 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1967
we held that “there is no arbitrary point in time at which the right to counsel attaches in pre-trial proceedings and that the critical point is to he determined from the nature of the proceedings and what actually occurs in each case.” P.2d 585 .
State v. Burrell 426 P.2d 633 Ariz. 1967
State v. Burrell 426 P.2d 633 Ariz. 1967
this court held: “ * * * there is no arbitrary point in time at which the right to counsel at *138 taches in pre-trial proceedings and that the critical point is to be determined from the nature of the proceedings and what actually occurs in each case.
State v. Moses 420 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1966
State v. Moses 420 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1966
(No. 1440, June 10, 1965); , ; , .”
State v. Soders 419 P.2d 733 Ariz. 1966
State v. Soders 419 P.2d 733 Ariz. 1966
State v. Wise 419 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1966
State v. Wise 419 P.2d 342 Ariz. 1966
Burke v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 416 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Burke v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 416 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Chambers 414 P.2d 742 Ariz. 1966
State v. Chambers 414 P.2d 742 Ariz. 1966
Yanez v. State 412 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Yanez v. State 412 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Smith 407 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goff 407 P.2d 55 Ariz. 1965
State v. Smith 407 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goff 407 P.2d 55 Ariz. 1965
State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
In the time since this appeal was filed and the propositions of law presented herein were briefed
State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
State v. Gortarez (No. 1440), , State v. Schumacher (No. 1430)
State v. Gortarez 402 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1965
State v. Gortarez 402 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1965
In State v. Schumacher, April 1, 1965, , , where defendant raised the same objection as in the instant case, contending that the preliminary hearing was a critical stage of the proceedings, we held: “Generally, the failure to assign counsel prior to preliminary examination, unless a defendant’s position has been prejudiced thereby, is not cons
State v. Herndon 400 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
State v. Herndon 400 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
decided by the Arizona Supreme Court on April 1, 1965.