DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Murphy, 396 P.2d 250.

38 citing documents.

  • State v. Tolano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Tolano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    See Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973) (“When a criminal defendant has solemnly admitted in open court that he is in fact guilty of the offense with which he is charged, he may not thereafter raise independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea.”); (holding that a defendant’s guilty plea forecloses challenges to the legality of a search 3 STATE v. TOLANO Decision of the Court or seizure); (holding that a vin
  • State v. Smith 599 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Smith 599 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Diaz 588 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Diaz 588 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Chagnon 564 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Chagnon 564 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Arnsberg 553 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Arnsberg 553 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Lerner 551 P.2d 553 Ariz. 1976
  • State v. Lerner 551 P.2d 553 Ariz. 1976
    -51 (1964), that “[w]hen a defendant voluntarily and knowingly pleads guilty at his trial this constitutes a waiver of all nonjurisdictional defenses .
  • State v. Miller 518 P.2d 127 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Miller 518 P.2d 127 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Starks 512 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
  • State v. Starks 512 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
  • State v. Hostler 507 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Hostler 507 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1973
    * A valid guilty plea waives all non-jurisdictional defenses, , in-, eluding, of course, the defense of not guilty by reason of insanity.
  • State v. Defoy 506 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Defoy 506 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Celaya 484 P.2d 7 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Celaya 484 P.2d 7 Ariz. 1971
    474 , , , 295 P. 311 (1931).
  • State v. Martinez 427 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1967
  • State v. Martinez 427 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1967
    Thomas v. United States, 290 F.2d 696 (9th Cir. 1961); Alexander v. United States, 290 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1961); Swepston v. United States, 289 F.2d 166 (8th Cir. 1961); Warren v. United States, 232 F.2d 629 (5th Cir. 1956).
  • Cuzick v. State 421 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • Cuzick v. State 421 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
  • State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Sheppard 407 P.2d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
  • State v. Sheppard 407 P.2d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
  • State v. Lopez 405 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Lopez 405 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
    we stated: “The record shows that the defendant, who was represented by counsel, entered a plea of guilty.
  • State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
  • State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
  • State v. Alford 402 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Alford 402 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1965
    People v. Lehman, 51 Ill.App.2d 163 , 200 N.E.2d 528 (1964).
  • State v. Sparks 400 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Sparks 400 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1965
    we said: “When a defendant voluntarily and knowingly pleads guilty at his trial this constitutes a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defenses.