Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Alford, 402 P.2d 551.

38 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
See, e.g. , Endreson , 108 Ariz. at 370 , 498 P.2d at 458 (stating that "the question of the abolishment of the death penalty under the Arizona Constitution is a question properly left to the legislature or the people of this State through constitutional amendment"); State v. Alford , , 132, , 559 (1965) (declining to "pass upon whether capital punishment, as a public policy, is effective" because under Arizona's separation of powers, "[w]e are limited to the judicial function of faithfully and
State v. Ritch 774 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Ritch 774 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
On April 19, 1988, appellant entered into a plea agreement with the state whereby he pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, , cert.
State v. Ellison 526 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1974
State v. Ellison 526 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1974
State v. Miller 518 P.2d 127 Ariz. 1974
State v. Miller 518 P.2d 127 Ariz. 1974
State v. Ortiz 492 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1972
State v. Ortiz 492 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1972
State v. Williams 489 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1971
State v. Williams 489 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1971
State v. Kennedy 472 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1970
State v. Kennedy 472 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1970
2060 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1008 ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , , rehearing den.
State v. Maloney 464 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1970
State v. Maloney 464 P.2d 793 Ariz. 1970
State v. Boggs 441 P.2d 778 Ariz. 1968
State v. Boggs 441 P.2d 778 Ariz. 1968
State v. Gibbs 435 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Gibbs 435 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
The defendant admits he expected a less severe sentence upon changing his plea to guilty, , and State v. Valenzuela, supra, that it may appear to defendant and counsel that the best avenue open to them is to plead guilty where the chance of a successful defense is negligible.
State v. Martinez 427 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1967
State v. Martinez 427 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1967
State v. Tuggle 418 P.2d 372 Ariz. 1966
State v. Tuggle 418 P.2d 372 Ariz. 1966
State v. Janovic 417 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1966
State v. Janovic 417 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1966
State v. Franklin 409 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Franklin 409 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
State v. Lopez 405 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
State v. Lopez 405 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
Thomas v. United States, supra.” 97 Ariz. at 15, 396 P.2d at 250 We again held, , , that defendant, having waived the right to question the admission of the evidence, may not now, on appeal, raise the question.
State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
State v. Wilson 405 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
In the time since this appeal was filed and the propositions of law presented herein were briefed
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
we stated: “We can not pass upon whether capital punishment, as a public policy, is effective.
State v. Valenzuela 403 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1965
State v. Valenzuela 403 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1965
This principle of law has been, , , (1965).